Since Bart is now available in Europe I have both options now and problem of choice :) People who have access to both for a while, what AI tool do you mostly use?
Since Bart is now available in Europe I have both options now and problem of choice :) People who have access to both for a while, what AI tool do you mostly use?
none, because 1. privacy nightmare, and 2. a glorified keyboard autocorrect isn’t a replacement for a search engine.
Both have option to turn off history saving. In this case they keep dialog for a short time only.
Regarding glorified keyboard autocorrect… I see this a bit different.
Anyways, thanks for sharing your opinion.
I’m sure this will prevent Google/Bing from storing everything you type in there on their end for as long as they please.
given how the very purpose of LLMs is to just create sequences of words that are statistically likely to follow each other in a sentence, and how there are countless examples out there of them hallucinating answers including non-existent court cases, or providing authors of articles with a list of articles they have not written and so on, I struggle to see it as anything else.
I already got that you do not found a use case - and this is fine. I asked for opinion of people who use these both tool and can compare
While I am generally inclined to agree with you, I do think AI is getting a bit more advanced than a glorified autocorrect. If you are interested in hearing some examples of cool things it is capable of I suggest listening to a recent episode of This American Life. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/803/greetings-people-of-earth Act One: First Contact is the section I am referring to
deleted by creator
This is a bit close minded and reductive when you can see a large number is examples where these tools beat the shit out of search engines, and search engines have been on a precipitous decline in quality for years now. Not talking shit; the privacy concerns are very valid and i dont think there is anything at all wrong with an anti-ai stance in these areas, I just don’t want novices reading this and thinking these tools are “glorified keyboard autocorrect” when some near version of them is undoubtedly the future of both internet search and internet assistant.
Not sure I fully agree. These tool are really ruddy brilliant at certain things (like writing or translating computer code, drafting certain documents) but they are poor at being factually correct. Unless / until they find a way to fact-check themselves I don’t see them replacing search, just complementing it.