Just gonna leave this here.

    • roguetrick
      link
      fedilink
      011 months ago

      I always recommend brave to less tech-savvy people,

      Why exactly? The tricks like “optional things to click” are explicitly targeted on less tech savvy people and defeat the point of privacy focused browsers.

        • hoodatninja
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Just getting somebody on Firefox with ublock origin is enough IMO. I’m not going to also remove their ability to use Google search. Especially if they’re older. I am very privacy oriented but you have to make some compromises for people lol.

        • QHC
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Those are choices, not requirements. Using Firefox is better than using Chrome. Doing the extra stuff is even better, but if doing that means someone gives up and goes back to Chrome, that doesn’t help, either.

          Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.

    • @Synthead@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You mentioned that politics should not be mentioned with software. Consider Hans Reiser, the author of reiserfs. He murdered his wife and was sent to prison. Would you be okay with running code written by a murderer on your computer? How about a vase made by a murderer in your house? Would you enjoy the voice of a murderer in music?

      • ch1cken
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        Quite the opposite, brave’s defaults are very good. An alternative to brave on the firefox side would be librewolf, which gives firefox great defaults, but the issue with that is that they disabled auto updates, and there’s still a lot of people on the windows side not using a package manager (even though many exist).

        bullshit integrated into it.

        And again, there’s no “bullshit” if you don’t explicitly opt into the crypto.