Seems to track pretty directly to me. Political system that results in less rights and less voice for the people equals less engagement. I mean that’s one to one almost. Particularly when that same system also favors corporations to an absurd degree that exploit workers the breaking point.
I kind of agree, although I wouldn’t say it tracks directly. But less workers rights surely means disengagement, less nuanced goals than just profits surely means disengagement.
Also anglo-saxon management philosophy is definitively part of this.
This is the logical outcome of liberalism IMO.
deleted by creator
I aint a fan of a two-party system - I’ll take the slow, stable Danish way any day.
But how is that directly related to disengaged workers?
Seems to track pretty directly to me. Political system that results in less rights and less voice for the people equals less engagement. I mean that’s one to one almost. Particularly when that same system also favors corporations to an absurd degree that exploit workers the breaking point.
I kind of agree, although I wouldn’t say it tracks directly. But less workers rights surely means disengagement, less nuanced goals than just profits surely means disengagement.
Also anglo-saxon management philosophy is definitively part of this.
I don’t think either of those two things would have any bearing on workplace happiness though.