• bstix
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    What is your opinion on people using “would of” instead of “would have”?

    I don’t think that accepting the lowest common denominator or following the tyrrany of majority is particularly democratic, when it’s clearly destroying the meaning of the language.

    Sure, so let’s say we accept it, but then how do we teach children these new rules? It’ll only result in further degradation of the language because nobody knows what is right or wrong anymore.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Seems pretty straightforward… Teach it like we always have, and then just add a quick, “the traditional contraction expands into, ‘should have,’ but recently, ‘should of’ has become popular colloquially despite the apparent error.”

      Or something like that, I don’t know. It’s not like English doesn’t already have a billion exceptions to every single rule. What’s one more slang term?

      Do I like it? Fuck no. It sounds/looks bad, and I will probably silently judge you if you say or write it lol

    • DempstersBox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Well for starters, kids aren’t going to whinge about it- they’re just going to use it, generally correctly for their setting.

      Headlines when a royal family kid is bilingual, every day regular-ass survival when a poor border town kid does it, unprompted.

      I mean, the royal kids totally would of got it on their own, right?