I would rather pay less (or zero) for online and get none of these mediocre games. This shit isn’t worth it.
I would rather pay less (or zero) for online and get none of these mediocre games. This shit isn’t worth it.
The interviewer had to make up a ridiculous “even a two year old?” hypothetical because the discussion was already over. She just seemed desperate.
There is no way for them to explain what he did that was good. They say that the economy was good but it was already good when he was sworn in.
I always point out that he had a very specific policy to take away children from people seeking asylum in the US and making sure to lose the paperwork so that those children never find their parents and ICE workers can freely abuse them.
For whatever reasons
The reason is cops and judges agree with those reasons.
Waving nazi flags and using their slogans should be treated as a threat at all times. There is no possible way that anything nazi is not implied violence.
The Sony WiiU GamePad. I don’t think there’s a huge market for that.
Is this PCgaming news or Activision/Blizzard marketing trying to salvage their sinking massively monetized ship?
Edit: for the record, I own a copy of the cash register that is Diablo 4. It will be the last Blizzard game I will ever buy as long as their policy of making the game just be a store. That pretty much means I won’t be buying another Blizzard game. I’ve gone over a decade without touching any EA so I know it won’t be difficult.
Larian games tend to highly reward thorough exploration with much needed XP and quality gear.
Not exploring an area 100% counts as a punishment because you missed out on XP, gear and NPCs that could definitely help.
I don’t think it matters if they’re different experiences.
What matters is that the game achieves what is set out to do and if that is an enjoyable and unique experience. Another thing that matters is if they can make a AAA game without scummy monetization.
The baseline system is almost always the most popular system. No developers should be hamstrung by MS’s bad business decisions.
I’m not sure that having BG3 run at 540p 30hz on the latest MS console will be good for Larian.
Their math is wrong but their heart is right. Still a keeper.
I think the idea for the S model is good. Where the X is for 4K and the S is for 1080p.
The execution of that idea is horrible. They have a weird RAM configuration.
Series X - 16GB GDDR6 RAM 10GB @ 560 GB/s 6GB @ 336 GB/s
Series S - 10GB GDDR6 RAM 8GB @ 224GB/s 2GB @ 56GB/s
It works out of the box.
It just doesn’t work how you particularly want it to.
Don’t they have an story mode for people that don’t like the strategy part of the strategy RPG?
You’re playing it wrong.
BG3 is a role playing game. You gotta play it like real life. In real life, if things don’t go your way, you drink strong alcohol. I highly recommend tequila or whisky.
Charisma too low? Tequila. Dexterity too low? Whisky. Enemy with 1HP dodges 3 attacks in a row? Tequila.
The game is easy as pie.
Why would you feel hoodwinked?
Larian makes strategic RPGs for people that play RPGs. It’s not like they lie about what their games are about or their difficulty.
Also, early access is for the developers to test out the game with a much larger pool than just the regular play testers. If anything it’s let the devs know how good or bad an idea is.
IHOP is better than a parking garage. At least there’s some miserable low paying jobs instead of almost zero that a garage provides.
The people close to Feinstein are 100% enjoying the power she gives them.
The Democratic Party is trying to keep the popular CA governor from appointing a senator so that they can put their own centrist on the ticket.
Activision Blizzard can’t make market leading games because they’re too busy getting convincing their workers to commit suicide.
More like investment in FOMO game design.
Why is that funny?