That would make more sense if redfash weren’t some of his biggest supporters

You’ll have to tell us, since you’re the only one who does it

I’m guessing you don’t watch South Park

Nonsense.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremist_nationalism_in_Russia

I made a comment comparing the number of Nazis in Ukraine to other countries and you responded with a bunch of articles about Ukraine. Where are the comparisons that demonstrate I’m wrong?

It’s the difference between those for whom leftism is an aesthetic and those who want material progress. Those who value the aesthetic can’t bear to compromise their aesthetic by voting for Harris, while those who care about people’s material conditions and doing work to actually make progress do vote for her.

Ukraine has a lower percentage of Nazis than most countries, including russia, which has one of the higher percentages

Yes, and it’s nonsense

The fact that your trans refugee friends continue to suffer is deplorable, but does not mean lgbt don’t have more rights now. You’re employing the same fallacy that anti-vaxxers use when they say it’s pointless to get a vaccine when it doesn’t 100% guarantee protection from the illness. Things are better for some people and still desperately need to improve for many others.

What a compelling rebuttal of their points /s

The endorsement I’ve been waiting for

The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi

Yeah but you have terrible taste. Thanks! :)

“leftist”

The Senate investigation found nothing illegal. That doesn’t mean Stein isn’t trying to help russian interests.

https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser

Republicans never claimed not to be pedophiles, so I think that’s on us for assuming

Telegram users have never had privacy. Group chats are completely in the open and private messages are only encrypted if both users turn it on for each conversation—and it’s off by default. I’ve never understood why anyone thinks Telegram is any better than posting anywhere else on the internet.

The question of why specific immigrants are here isn’t relevant to the topic of how they should be treated once they’re legally here. Some are here bc of bad US foreign policy, others aren’t, but all should be treated with respect.

Cluster munitions are bad when you’re an invading army bc some of the explosives fail to fire, endangering civilians who come across them later. Ukraine, however, is using them on its own territory to combat russia who 1) is already using cluster munitions with a greater fail rate than the ones the US is providing Ukraine, and 2) deliberately mines the areas they invade in a way to kill civilians (e.g. setting up a mine to explode if you try to move the corpse of a beloved family dog). So in this case, using the US’s cluster munitions to get russia out is a net positive.