/joke outside security patches? about every 2-3 years /joke

eagerly awaiting the win10 to wine10 pipeline

which, tbf is on every single disclaimer ever. it’s not even a giant document it’s like one paragraph of two on every single sale, and every time we launch the game

glares at broadcom

in my experience seeing a few new people come through our support channels the immutables unfortunately had a bigger learning curve

I learned some irritating lessons uninstalling everything from that list a few times. one of these days I’ll go through and set --asdeps so I remember why they’re installed

I’ll have to give that a go. the last one I looked at was already abandoned before I heard about it

I switched to a container running nginx proxy manager and haven’t looked back yet. I learned a whole lot setting up my proxy and TLS manually but now it’s really nice to be able to let the tool do its thing.

all I’m saying is, it sucks that this shit isn’t upstream

Jale translated. its just a bunch of vocalizations and "greetings and “how are you?” https://youtu.be/6gEGYJNYfP8

pretty optimistic tone setting for an old perry line world

I miss the bygone era of right click > publish

ah, a Minecraft launcher. thought I just saw a post lamenting how few decent third party launchers there are

can be casually disregarded with all the rest of the dates we’ve ever had

bleeding edge fsr does similarly I’m pretty sure

the protostar can replicate a whole shuttlecraft so sky is the limit (not really I guess)

nah nah nah addressing the room is all

Coincidently one of the things they list (named pipes) as an improvement is something I’ve had a nuisance with for years. there’s multiple things that I would love wine to have that it does not but proton does

for the millionth time they get to stand on the shoulders on all the wine development that came before it. and now we have to reckon with the bullshit of proton patches that never go upstream to make wine better for all

there’s A LOT of levers that can be fiddled with, but there’s some settings that fedora tested out that popos and arch use/recommend

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Zram#Optimizing_swap_on_zram

/etc/sysctl.d/99-vm-zram-parameters.confvm.swappiness = 180 vm.watermark_boost_factor = 0 vm.watermark_scale_factor = 125 vm.page-cluster = 0

archwiki tuning has a listing with swappiness set up to 180 (yes apparently the number can go over 100)