i’ve never used WeChat, isn’t it just like every other messenger though? 
i’ve never used WeChat, isn’t it just like every other messenger though? 
Really happy with sync on my chromebook. I use iOS nowadays and wasn’t expecting to enjoy using sync as an android app on chromebook?
You’re missing the point. Addiction isn’t the only issue.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28115737/
It’s not a competition of what is more or less harmful. I agree that they’re both worse than marijuana. I don’t see reasonable argument for pretending there are no risk though. As you know, we throughly awknowledge the risk of tobacco and alcholol. I think going back to caffiene is fair though. Most people they know there are risk to caffiene and they know that having too much of it can cause issues. Warning or awknowledment of risk isn’t to sway convince people not to do something, it’s to give them informormation to make an informed decision.
here’s the two options to present:
vs
The point I am trying to make is that it’s not harmless. There’s positives and negatives. I just know a lot people(and have seen people argue online) who can’t stop talking about the positives and act like there’s literally no risk. It has risks.
They’re not extreme or anything that means it should be banned but there is risk. To argue otherwise would be disingenuous. I think people are either being deliberately disingenuous, or maybe they literally don’t know that there is potential risk with marijuana use.
At least with caffeine I would approach it with caution similar to marijuana. Dosages above 300 mg/day are shown to have negative health effects. In general it is fine. Marijuana is also generally safe, but can have negative effects if you take too much or use too often.
People rarely refer to theanine as a drug. It’s more of a dietary supplement (food). It’s an amino acid.
I feel like the pendulum of how safe or dangerous weed is has spun back in the opposite direction. At the end of the day weed is a drug. There’s worse things out there’s but it’s not harmless. I know potheads who look at it like it’s another green leafy vegetable that also cures cancer.
Edit: I just realized this is the science community. This article is not science. It’s news or maybe an editorial. There’s plenty of legit studies to post if we want to have this discussion.
Just so you know, the buttons are redundent. You can swipe left out right on the comment depending on what you’re trying to do. I think the button should disappear though at the end.
I understand but the concern but your device is reporting the location anonymously and you are not tied to the report.
It only notifies you if the air tag is without ite owner. If this wasn’t the case I’d be getting notifications left and right for my wife’s airtag. Instead I only get notifications when her phone is left behind but her tag is with me.
I think I read that they had permission from the city but the landlord themselves didn’t approve it.
I don’t know if new plans still come with YouTube music but mine does. That plus ad free YouTube on device.
true when it comes to broad search terms, but google should bring lemmy to the top if you type in [search term] lemmy just like we do know with [search term] reddit.
I have that labs feature enabled, this is what I get when I prompt it. Here
I don’t mind if they are or aren’t either way, but it doesn’t make sense to tear down discord for essentially the same thing if you’re ok with Lemmy doing it. Whether they should or shouldn’t is another question. Also, it’s possible for my upvotes and down votes to be collected but hidden much like it is on reddit.
 this looks like it’s actually from their normal search with the labs feature turned on for ai. Bard is separate but uses the same tech.
You say that, but I see no evidence that Lemmy is a good place for privacy either, yet here you are. I know upvotes and down votes are public and I know that your post are freely shared and stored across the fediverse.
I’m guessing they never opened up the API for chats. 3rd party app users never saw chats
Hard to argue Tesla at fault when clearly the driver was impaired and at fault here.