

FBI used to create or take over such websites and collected the credentials of any visitors, then made lists of targets to arrest. Nowadays, they skip the arresting part.
FBI used to create or take over such websites and collected the credentials of any visitors, then made lists of targets to arrest. Nowadays, they skip the arresting part.
Organize and help her and others like her.
Uh, yeah you do. What do you think charities are for? Helping people?
Too bad he wasn’t a Jeffrey… Those guys get all the fun roles.
Sadly, posturing is often a great motivator for poorly thought-out decisions.
Pushing through with a wrong decision regardless of the end result would be a matter of losing self worth, I think. Apologizing is often felt as a position of weakness that opens up a vulnerability in a pretty much shoddy armour of fragile self worth and losing even that much might trigger an existential crisis that threatens the core of one’s identity.
Another part might be us not being wired to naturally consider long-term effects, as it’s usually a taught trait. So much of our emotional presence is rooted in the moment rather than several steps ahead. And a psychological danger is often resolved with an immediate and superficial response.
To become and remain what is considered as well adjusted is a difficult process that needs repeated efforts of introspection. And not many can or are willing to go through the process. So being respectful of one another is something to be admired because it’s not something we can do by default. I’d say instinctual and often disrespectful responses are our usual default state instead.
When we talk about things, we use our accumulated knowledge to create a context. However because that knowledge isn’t the same for everyone, the understandable context can be similar, but different.
So for example, a person who doesn’t know about college trans athletes, but knows about trans won’t understand the same context as someone who knows the subject in depth or as someone who knows little about the concept itself. But if they all recognize the 1% as the rich elite, then they can all vaguely share that partial context.
It might be an exaggeration in my case because yeah, still I would say that people in general should avoid expectations for everyone participating in this kind of conversation to share the same understanding of the context at hand.
Common sense isn’t universal. Perception is unequal. Divergence in way of thought is to be expected.
But yeah, I support both opinions you’ve extracted independently from each other.
You mean the Empire, rebel scum!
Oh i know the thought process is off center for the comment, but I found it funny (for me anyway) and posted the result because, why not.
Saw the picture, thought of “hey, my eyes are up here”, then of the Simpsons “i made my choice” meme. The writing said “1%”, but a lot of men have only one singular thought when staring at a woman’s chest. So taking the whole “you’re focused on the wrong 1%” as referring to breasts as a body part and only a small part of the individual, the meaning can become “stop staring at my tits and see me as a person”. But then I thought, different sizes, different percentages. Looking at the picture again, assigning just 1% to it would probably mean a small size, tiny even, and i felt upset on their behalf in this short imaginary journey. Hence the comment.
Now, was that the thought process you were imagining when you made your comment or something else entirely?
Everyone should be fucking weird. Isn’t that kind of the point?
Why discriminate? Tiny titties deserve being stared at too!
No such thing as EA customer support. It only exists on paper. It’s become cheaper to just wait for a lawsuit because you as an individual are worthless to them.
Looks like Todd managed to pierce the dimensional veil and re-release Skyrim within the MCU.
Weren’t there stories about sheep following their leaders off cliffs?
And don’t lions win territories by being more suicidal than their opponent?
Animals are quite similar to humans. We’re all just trying to survive with whatever we have at hand.
Execs are seeing a Fallout, everyone else seeing a Borderlands.
Would be a weird day to have execs be right.
Oh look! A wild Doctor Who reference. Don’t blink!
I played, but didn’t finish it. It was like FC3, but with tribal warfare instead of tourist vs drug dealers. And instead of the hot, but crazy baby momma you get the sweet, but crazy baby momma. Also, the enemy tribe’s leader lacked Vaas’ presence. The sabertooth tiger stalking you had a greater personality than that guy, in my opinion.
That shit’s too dry. Add more greens for the extra mush.
Stop it Patrick, you’re scaring them!
It’s the other way around chief, radicalized young men seek out extreme porn because they ain’t getting any of that vanilla loving.
And the way to getting that is properly educating them on consent and treating their partner with the equal love and respect they yearn for.
There’s bad blood there, but the original DA team should be completely gone with the last members having been sacked during Veilguard debacle.
Maybe EA would like to shit on it one more time with a crappy remaster, who knows.