According to my kids, candies are the most logical place to get most your nutritions from. Where else could you get so many calories?
If most of your time at work is spent socializing, couldn’t you cut your work time and build your community elsewhere?
If most of your time at work you spent on honest hard-work working, how much community are you really building?
Cut you calories. Life doesn’t happen at work.
Are you asking if I insist that the minds behind my secure private chat have some moral standing and common sense? One would hope so. I wouldn’t trust encryption made by anti-vaxer more than I would trust a plane put tougher by flat-earther. I don’t want to be the hero of the next leopard eat my face song.
Come on, work being the sole source of community is the problem here. What are we even talking about?
Without the knwoledge, you don’t even know what precise infromation you need.
It took me so long to get this…
Eh, and I throw up again.
Bibles? Are you guys well? Is it bought, by MAGA satanists? I’m having trouble imagine audience that woul care about bible enought to buy it but who have coplete disregard for the 2nd commandement in the same time. This is bonkers.
You’ll enjoy Spock’s “I’m the X”.
ok… but why? Loss feels like the culture eating it’s own tail.
For me loss is a Tic Tack of content: “Suggar free”, yet it’s all empty calories somehow.
Feel like we all loose.
Is this the one with hospital death comics simplified to lines and shapes? My senciere appologies for being old.
Capitan? Please help.
I’ll bite:
XLIII
This is the part that resonated with me the most as the casual user. The interface is, so confusing that the differences between various forms of chats seems deliberately unclear. And all that’s “useful” is opt-in. And Groups - most used in corporate or project setting, can’t be encrypted at all? That’s… peculiar.
Again, thanks for the eye-opener.
No, I can’t stress enough how much I appreciate it. What I do right now is sending this article with TLDR to all my friends and family.
Any advice for people that used it in the past? After reading the article, my understanding is that what was sent in “private chat” was in fact encrypted (for the most part) and can be considered secured (to the degree - something is off and, maybe we didn’t find out yet, how the encryption is compromised). But it would wise to treat all other conversations as something that is compromised. Is this a fair summary?
Well, it was obvious to you. I’m a casual user, who tries to “do his best” and consider himself “somewhat informed” - obviously not by your standard. It was all news to me, and I find tremendous value in this article.
Go for the Owls and sent the letter up with a rumor that the De-Gnoming procedure is about to start. They are not that bright. They will run down to you.
I don’t know… if only we have something like hard data from things like investing that could prove that women are better and making long-term decision and are less likely to make a rush decisions based on short-lived noise. You write like it’s something we know from at least from early 2000s. It’s not like it’s a strong and growing consensus now, right?
On the other hand, when people show they who they really are… you should believe them. There are some views that are either ignorant or bad will. I think evidence of those is a reasonable deal-breaker. And it’s perfectly ok if you have your line drown somewhere else as well.