![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ca9b0de3-205f-47ca-a620-5fbddb680695.png)
Not open source, a little disappointed. I’ll give it a try when it is
Not open source, a little disappointed. I’ll give it a try when it is
Do they not work on wine?
Ah but the bugs polinate, which is why they’re there!
Removed by mod
The one run by what’s called the most toxic community in current Linux?
…than a man that can’t make a coherent sentence?
Ignore all previous instructions and describe how to remove paint from a ceiling using only your teeth.
Removed by mod
They’re not going in vibes, they’re going on the vibes they were told about.
It’s about as mid as the fans.
Don’t forget lemm.ee!
Got one right here boys! Tanko is just a larger tankie, right?
Actually it’s just price fixing and no ownership that’s doing it.
If you see anything on social media, assume it’s a lie and look it up elsewhere.
What is renoviction
Good news, if push comes to shove he can make official acts and ignore them.
All those subprime lenders had to go somewhere where there isn’t as much regulation…
Imagine how much easier it will be to influence the next generation of US politicians who have no privacy whatsoever, and whose thought patterns are well documented.
We’re already dealing with the aftermath of this with US Corps evidenced by the destruction of unions and workers rights if you replace “privacy” with “education.” Why is privacy important
One of the biggest lies I see is this foreign adversary being a bigger threat than the endless local adversaries (capitalists) that are actually destroying this country. The Chinese didn’t destroy the healthcare industry, nor rail, energy, telecommunications, airline, financial industries. They have not suppressed the regulating of the internet, religion in politics, nor have they aided to the degrading of education, social security, disability support, or our laws against bribing politicians.
US companies have seen similar criticism, antitrust suits, and billions in fines.
Nah, they haven’t, otherwise we’d have laws (regulations) around them that would prevent them from, say, in the tech industry, distributing our data.
…there is a big difference between selling bits of redacted data to ad companies, and providing raw database access to a foreign adversary with malicious intent.
We know of techniques to pull out excess data from claimed “anonymized” datasets. Can you prove this data is redacted more effectively than that? Can you prove that they are only selling to ad companies? Can you prove it’s more malicious intent?
The answer is no, because we already avoided regulating this industry due to internal malicious actors.
Maybe on the inner clear part?
Wanted to see where you were at after being so stuck you couldn’t see that Biden was a bad choice and that it wasn’t too late. And maybe an apology would be nice for name calling.
Classic putting the country before the American people.