Just to be clear, I am not an M–L, I’m explaining their position because it’s important to understand when it comes to geopol.

Also, right now US is not the country that’s launching drones to blow up the civilian houses in the city I live in

That’s absolutely true. And on the other hand, the US are also launching drones to blow up civilian houses in other countries, so you will find plenty of people online who are more against the US, just like you rightfully have good reason to want Russia to fall. Ukraine is the theatre of a proxy war between NATO and Russia, and it’s a fucking tragedy. The M–L position is that, being a proxy war, the US prolonged it for their own benefit (it’s not their soldiers and citizens being attacked) until they finally threw Ukraine away and negotiated terms with the enemy. Normally that step happens diplomatically behind doors when they do it to other countries.

Just like I said, “critical support”. They’re clear that it’s a capitalist “dictatorship of the owning class” (like other liberal-democracies) and that they’re critical of their domestic policies. If NATO were no longer as powerful as it is now, then they’d move on to calling for the Russian Federation’s fall, but it’s clear which of the two is a more imminent threat to countries around the globe. It’s like voting for Democrats over Republicans in the US election – they’ve both proven themselves to be terrible but voting for the lesser evil might be pragmatically effective, and voting third party or boycotting is debatably an idealistic waste of effort.

As someone else mentioned, this is a campist approach to geopolitics.

the US

I wouldn’t limit “the imperial core” to the US, but basically, yes.

This recent thread is pretty insightful on lemmygrad.ml’s position. Their own users repeatedly emphasize that they are critical of the RF, which shouldn’t be a surprise given that it’s a capitalist country with plenty of reactionary domestic policies. (OP didn’t get banned)

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/7374513?sort=Top

I don’t think it’s fair to categorize it as accelerationist, although definitely campism and critical support (that is, taking a side while remaining critical of it) - like you said, they know and despair that Russia is no longer socialist, they only side with the RF in this conflict as a ‘lesser evil’ than the dominant NATO camp. We saw the US prolong the proxy war (it’s not their soldiers dying) until the they openly threw Ukraine away and negotiated terms with the RF when the war seemed no longer useful (this part usually happens more diplomatically and privately in a proxy war, but it usually happens).

If you want to argue with someone in good faith you should try to understand their position first, otherwise they will just see you as a reactionary and dismiss what you say.

Absolutely. The .ml instances are stricter than most and don’t cater to anyone they perceive as ignorant and parroting propaganda in bad faith. From their point of view, it’s just as simple as how most instances would ban conservatives coming in and starting bigoted, ignorant oft-debunked Fox News arguments about racism and transphobia. Why bother platforming it?

Alright, thanks for the quick reply!

@inlandempire@jlai.lu

!rage@aussie.zone have had a couple of submissions which we think are outside the time-range, and I think the rules are clear enough, but we just want confirmation before we disqualify them. (I’m going to put them on our community voting ballot regardless, but I’ll make sure we’re all aware if they can’t be submitted)

• This one was from an album released March 2024, but was released as a single on August 2023
• This one was released in March 2025

I highly recommend reading Manufacturing Consent^[wiki]. It’s easy to find free online. It explains how mass media is systematically filtered by five major factors, the first being ownership, which is more and more relevant every year as media outlets consolidate under the ownership of billionaires like Murdoch, Bezos, Musk and Bloomberg, who have very different material class interests to the other 99.99999[…]% of the population.

Speaking of Australia:

https://www.betootaadvocate.com/humans-of-betoota/tesla-owner-sticks-this-on-their-car-like-they-werent-already-a-complete-and-utter-dick-hole-beforehand/

Exactly. Luckily it tends to get fixed up once it reaches the clouds.

It might be easier to use the save button (star)

Then simply go to your profile page to see your saved posts:

The water here is flipped upside down too. That’s why you sometimes see it written as H²O instead of H₂O. In year 9 chemistry class, we had some joker combine water the wrong way and it just splashed down to the ceiling until it evaporated.

It doesn’t help that the original comic says that exact word as the punchline.

For fighting tyranny bolt actions are solid.

Are you aware of what gear the tyrants’ armies have? They’re not going to be fiddling around with bolt action rifles, I can tell you that much.

Guns are a tool, and horrible people using fully auto weapons isn’t a good reason for us to avoid them.

It’s been done before. Redneck Revolt (antifascist) even had a temporary relationship with a full-on lolbert militia (American Pit Vipers) after APV saw all the disgusting neo-nazis at Charlottesville and realised that antifascists aren’t crying wolf.

An Australian anti-fascist perspective: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ2KvtlLJyQ

Nazis aren’t “people you disagree with”. They’re anti-social violence-worshippers, and in this Australian context, terrorists grooming children. The main Australian neo-Nazi group literally had leadership get caught applying for a job in disability services when they said they only wanted to work cases for young boys[1]. ASIO have emphasised the decreasing age of NSNs membership. Their strategy, like many neo-Nazi orgs, is to indoctrinate and recruit disaffected and alienated teenagers.

Yes.

It’s kinda weird to sort of start rolling back to where some type of conservatism is actually a good thing.

For what it’s worth, politics is more complex than conservation and change. The status quo is what got us here, so we must to better than merely conserve.

Apples and oranges. A nazi salute is not a racial comment. It’s a signal of allegiance to extermination (which, by the way, extermination is physically violent).

The idealistic fantasy that we should permit the intentional organisation of Nazism is not an effective way to preserve liberty of speech. Australia has no intention of becoming the failing pseudo-liberalist state that the USA is. So if the law doesn’t stop them, our communities will continue to step up and silence them ourselves.

A Nazi salute is a form of hate crime against Jewish people, would it also be illegal to use Racial Slurs?

Why would it? One does not imply the other.

Also, a Nazi salute isn’t just a slur. It’s (at least) signaling that you want a bunch of groups exterminated (Jews are one of those many groups).