What are you disputing? You can dispute inaccurate or fraudulent marks on your credit.

That’s awesome! Just wanted to get you to take a second look in case you were as diligent as my friend but it sounds like you’re right, then!

You sure about that? I have a friend who thought that too but found out 7 years later that only a bankruptcy will disappear after 7 years, not just idle delinquint accounts. He needed to actually file for bankrupcy to make it go away. This was in Usa, NY; maybe it’s different other places.

As a second “data” point: I have some accounts on my credit report that have not been touched in a decade+ yet they are still there (they are not delinquent).

Usenet? Most new media can be found there. The most copyright-contentious files are not on there for long so most folks use automated downloaders.

We’ve already solved this issue without biometrics. The manufacturers just cheaped out on actually implementing it in the affected models.

A library.

Look for the guy with a burnt cock.

What do you mean? I never really see much about RFKjr but I don’t have him tagged as a topic of interest.

I’m not sure because I live in the US but the feed is based on “tags” you select. It seems like they process stories from around the world but I don’t have a grasp on how comprehensive they are, internationally.

I’m not familiar with MBFC. It may be similar but I don’t mind throwing some $$ at any project making these efforts. What I like about Ground News is that all the sources for a given story are aggregated to one page, sorted based on political bias, and rated on accuracy. That information combined with the “Blindspot” feature (which highlights when a story is disproportionately covered more by one side) is very powerful IMO. It looks like the blindspot feed it’s available to non-subscribers but doesn’t include the political bias of the source: https://ground.news/blindspot

Ground News. The blind spot feature gives me great insight to where my “out of touch” family is coming from with their political narratives.

It’s encrypted and based out of Germany (so, outside of five eyes). The ui is shit but if you use an app for email it’s great. They also offer anonymous payment methods if you’re into that.

Glad I stuck with mailbox.org.

Economists at Harvard studied a four year period and concluded the IRS gains $4.25 for every $1 spent on auditing wealthiest tax payers.

I wonder if the IRS can immediately recover funds with a magic wand or if it’s a protracted, investigative process.

https://www.businessinsider.com/irs-tax-audits-recover-12-dollars-for-every-dollar-spent-2023-6

Your quote states they get $80b over ten years. How many years has it been? You got this!

Your comment would be accurate if it cost them $80B to recover $1B.

Your own quote points out:

$80 billion for the IRS over a 10-year period.

Which makes your comments misleading, not accurate.

Sure, but Trump didn’t sound like he was lost at the grocery store. Most of what Trump said was nonsense he made up on the spot but he said it with confidence. Trump knows his supporters won’t fact check him; Biden is burdened with the truth. It’s not fair but we unfortunately need someone who can spar with Trump on stage. If someone flusters Trump on stage he will spiral out of control.

That’s how replies are made from mastodon afaik.

It all comes down to:

But the largest hurdle to making plant-based proteins a more viable alternative for everyone is the U.S. government’s deep investment in the status quo. Washington spends up to $38 billion subsidizing the meat and dairy industries each year, a move that keeps prices artificially low.

I wonder how they will pin this on democrats.