Oh my goodness Light No Fire looks so good. I really hope they’ve learned the right lessons from No Man’s Sky, because that trailer looked like everything I want from a game.
they/them
Oh my goodness Light No Fire looks so good. I really hope they’ve learned the right lessons from No Man’s Sky, because that trailer looked like everything I want from a game.
This is the most excited I’ve been about a giveaway in a while. The first game was well done and told an interesting story.
Okay, that’s a fair point. They left too many blanks for the reader to fill in, and some will assume the problem is more widespread than it is.
When I put my Social Scientist hat on, I don’t think the methodology was totally unreasonable or obviously malicious, so X would have to strengthen their claims to convince me to wait for court. But you’re right, MM should have done better.
I agree with your point in general, but I have a hard time applying it here. Unless the lawsuit alleges that MM hacked into Twitter or doctored the screenshots, then the core claim of the MM report “Twitter served ad Y next to post Z” is not under dispute. If the claim is that refreshing a page is malicious, then I don’t think we need to wait to call the lawsuit malicious.
This was what sold me on standing desks too! Taking a dance break halfway through writing a Very Professional Email almost makes it pleasant.
This is a beautiful blog post and I recommend reading it. I never used Omegle, but I now understand what we’ve lost.
deleted by creator
I had exactly this problem. It’s super annoying that there’s no error message explaining the character limit.
Thanks a ton for this, it’s really helpful! I’ve been conflicted because intellectually I like things like “ol” or “ul” more than “iel” for the reason you described, but I’m not strong enough in French to be a good advocate for them. “Iel” feels easiest, right now.
Would “elleux” replace all uses of third-person plural, or only those including non-binary people?
Regarding your FYI: Sorry you’ve dealt with that, it’s so frustrating!! It’s so hard to know what approach will help people understand, and I can see why a lot of people don’t bother. Thanks for working to make things better :)
Thank you SO much for your answers here! And for writing that awesome Wikipedia page, which I somehow hadn’t seen before. A few follow up questions, if you don’t mind:
Thanks! It’s really hard to get a feel for what people actually use and recognize. There are resources saying “here are 20 NB pronouns that exist”, which is great, but they’re not helpful to someone without a fairly sophisticated level of fluency. Perhaps [iel/ellui/lea] is an option, despite my dislike of the gender-combo construction.
The tech that made this possible is really cool. They force DNA through a teeny-tiny hole in a protein, and measure changes in voltage to ID each individual letter.
Totally different from traditional shotgun sequencing!
In case anyone needs to hear it: If you drink plant milk then this chart says you should feel good about yourself! You don’t have to super-duper optimize to two decimal places by forcing yourself to drink a plant milk you don’t like. Good work :)
You have to check the “include prereleases” toggle. Right now Slide only has very early development builds available.
I believe Misskey/Calckey are meant to be exactly this, but I haven’t tried them yet.
I love it! Perfect blend of simple, sleek, cute, and friendly.
Thanks for these! The GoC has something similar, and it actually acknowledges the existence of iel, which surprised me. I hadn’t seen the ones you linked, so it’ll be good to compare. It’s so confusing!
This is something that’s been driving me nuts. I’ve found lots of material on the concepts of “iel” and la rédaction épicène, but I can’t find many long-form examples for understanding how to actually use them. Any thoughts on where I could find articles or essays written without gender?
Huge props for being one of the few major instances to preemptively shut down!
I actually didn’t get that sense this time. Certainly the trailer left a lot to the imagination, and that’s letting me imagine impossible features that weren’t shown. But I thought Murray was very tame in his explanation. He didn’t really promise anything beyond a giant procedural world with multiplayer, and we know they can deliver on that. Everything else might suck. I get why people are skeptical about this, but I’m feeling confident that the final product will match what was shown here.