for the nsfw patch itself? probably just some code to halt stuff like blur for nsfw posts and the such. i dont think there is much going on changes wise with the patch. otherwise it is just built on top of the lemmy-ui. IMO

github.com/lemmyNet/

and if you want the specific issue that was this vulnerability: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1895

according to these rules, its on a case by case bases that would be up to the mods/admins of what they feel about the piece and its context. if any of them dont feel comfortable with it for looking too young, will be removed. atleast that is how i read it.

e.g. the rebecca/midna shortstack argument that is brought up in these comments

TBF, the current rules were made in haste and have only been around a short time to mitigate things getting out of hand, so people could think with clear heads instead of putting out fires. also mods are kind of on a churn since we are still dealing with a user base that sees the new shiny and wants to do something with it before moving on (for various reasons, nothing against those people). so there are the occasional community that has a mod that has not done any posting or commenting in 20 days and active mods are trying to figure stuff out with limited tooling.

not to mention that the new rules go some way to helping with that, leaving the mods/admins to interpret the context of the piece and its surrounding media to determine and if any one of them feels it should be removed, it will be. i also agree with @kellySunshine in this message thread

potentially? i think the AI thing has more to do with copyright then consent at this point though and its something society as a whole is still trying to find the boundaries of

yah, probably best to stay within safe harbor provisions as best as possible