Zoko Argen

That’s a completely valid and respectable opinion, tbh for me it’s the other problem of finding the dungeon crawling too long in persona 4 🤣.

But yeah, not every game is for everyone, and they wanted to fill this niche, and you have other games like Dragon Quest which are more to your liking.

Persona from what I’ve heard is great, but I am not the type of person who can sink in 160 hours into a game 🤣.

In respect to the Persona series, it’s simply because that’s the game. They want you to plan your social interactions.

I haven’t played 5, but what I played of 4 you get bonuses from maxing out your relationships, so having a limit on actions means you have to choose and plan what you are gonna do, otherwise the game would just be a case of maxing relationships day 1 and then dungeon crawling for 5 hours until the next cutscene.

For comfy games, there is a balance, a time limit means you aren’t doing everything in 1 day, but I have always felt Stardew’s is a little too short, especially for the stamina and movement speed.

But you can’t do everything in one day irl, you are a new farmer setting everything up, and getting back on your feet, it takes time, and the days passing make the world feel more alive than if time didn’t pass.

As for seasons, it is annoying when you miss events or stuff, but it is a nice aesthetic, again makes you feel like time is advancing and bringing change, prevents it becoming too boring, Stardew would probably be a lot more boring without the season to change the fish that spawn and the crops you can grow

Thanks for this! I assumed this would be the case, but you do get rule oddities in magic, especially in weird cases like this. I can’t think of an instance of that either, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there was one somewhere.

Yeah, I like the second one better. Allowing interaction and protection seems like a good idea, and makes the card less of a feels bad.

That being said, I think a more thematic effect would be something along the lines of a “Blood Moon” like effect. “Target lands loses all land types and abilities, and gains the ability '{T}: Add {C}”. Though this offers less interaction and is a massive feel bad for decks that rely on a land for a combo since it would still be in the field just unusable.

It’d have to say “non-token”, since they are the ones creating the token they’d control it (I think you control anything on your battlefield regardless but not 100% on that).

I am unsure how token ownership works… but I don’t think that is good either as that removes the ability of sacrificing a land you’ve stolen.

Kirk was always in the chat, he’s now just more open with kinks

To be fair, that’s probably expected in Ferengi custom

The top numbers are what they’d pay in tax, not what they have

Northener here. I don’t mean to take away from your point, because you are mostly correct, but my school at least did teach us about the harrying, though I can’t remember how much detail, but it was at least a few lessons on the aftermath of 1066 and how the Normans took control.

I will mention (mostly because I find it funny) that I remember hearing about a planned revolution in Britain (around the time of other European revolutions) that was called off because of the rain.