Ah yes, just how I remember the Gameboy, struggling to see the screen.
But seriously, the top ones look great!
Ah yes, just how I remember the Gameboy, struggling to see the screen.
But seriously, the top ones look great!
Ah yes, just how I remember the Gameboy, struggling to see the screen.
But seriously, the top ones look great!
I think Magneto’s power is to control metal, not just magnetic metal. Magneto is just a misnomer/nickname.
Also, there is a jerboa community that is pretty active here: https://lemmy.ml/c/jerboa or am I supposed to do !jerboa@lemmy.ml ?
That’s too bad. I thought the point was that we could have one account and be able to visit other instances. Hopefully there will be another way to add instances through search or links.
Nice work. I have a similar color scheme, but I use partially transparent key caps and RGB to pull it off.
Leaving this up for other clueless folks. But this feature has been completed in a record -19 hours.
You are totally right! I didn’t see this one until after the most recent update 0.0.33!
That would be wonderful! I don’t really understand how to add new instances to Jerboa right now.
Yep, I’ve heard of Mastadon before. Honestly, I prefer the Nostr model more. I’m kinda worried about the moderation of instances messing things up for Lemmy, but so far enjoying myself.
However, don’t the odds of splitting your winnings increase if you pick something more likely to be chosen by others?
I’m not sure I understand what you mean by open in home vs open in original? Does a single post have separate comment threads depending on the instance? Or are they meshed?
I literally only understood this after getting an account on one instance, and realizing I still saw posts and could interact with them from other instances. And I’m a web developer with pretty deep technical knowledge.
A simple “choose your home, see and interact with content from everywhere” would go a long way.
DnD doesn’t really have rules where you can’t coordinate with your other players, and requires a hive mind consensus. My worry is that it will be too far afield from what the players are used to.
If you wanted to keep it more similar to 5e rules, you could give the players a free action to order the godling to do something, but require a DC roll to make the check (whatever makes sense, Arcana, persuasion, wisdom, religion). If the DC is failed, or multiple characters do the order action, then some random combination of target/ability is executed. If no order is given, do some random stuff.