Not for me it isn’t.

Hahaha

5% daily, of global revenue.

Now that’s how penalties should work.

Next.

Life goes on.

I don’t mean to sound callous, but all we can do is choose our own thoughts and actions.

The library.

Tons of books on CD, takes minutes to rip.

They also have audio books via streaming apps and digital players (like an mp3 player with a single book). With either of those you have to do the old school record the audio though, so I avoid them u less I absolutely have to.

I also do mp3 rips of videos that are mostly just lectures, where visual isn’t critical.

This is the answer.

The only downside is you can see how stripped those screws are even in this photo. That’ll be fun.

Keys are brass, not magnetic

I have repeatedly caught those “experts” contradicting their own statements during a diagnosis, a couple times in urgent care when a family member was in serious distress.

It wasn’t intentional on their part, just an oversight, as it happens with all of us.

I learned to carefully track statements/conditions/limits while diagnosing tech problems in team discussions under pressure. In that environment, anyone can call out a mistake or contradictory statements, as the goal is accurate diagnoses.

Just because someone is an “expert”, doesn’t make them infallible.

Additionally, it’s not for them to decide my course of treatment - it’s for them to help me understand the risks of different treatments, the likelihood of success, and we decide together.

I aay this as having just gone through saying no to major surgery that the docs just assumed I would do.

My body, my choice.

This kind of question is similar to proving a negative in logic.

You’re asking why people think it’s trustworthy, implying you believe it isn’t.

1. *Which people think it’s trustworthy? You used an ambiguous “many people” - I’d need to see something supporting this assumption.

2. It would be more useful for you to give examples of why you don’t find it trustworthy, as this is what really matters with regard to any source.

I don’t trust any one source, and instead try to piece together a likely truth by considering the different sources and how a story is told. I’m surely wrong as much as I’m right, but it’s the best any of us can do.

Ok, so what “back doors” does it install?

Claims without evidence are just that - claims. I see nothing you’ve posted to be evidentiary.

That said, there is potential for malicious behaviour, but let’s not go off half-cocked on this.

Have you read your reply to OP?

It’s a bunch of circular repetitive answers that simply re-iterate what OP has already said.

So it sounds like an LLM response.

Meh, this would’ve been funny in the 90’s, maybe - which is when I heard a version of it.

Many states have people with multiple dui’s

Hahaha, that’s the point of a password manager. If remembering worked, we wouldn’t need any of this.

Also, I have 300+ unique logins.

Pretty much every car today IS AWD - a better version of plain old 4WD. So even your analogy doesn’t work.

That’s your first question? Not the talking rabbit digging a tunnel to Albuquerque?

Have you tried Open Camera?

Has tons of adjustability.

You do understand that written English is a descriptive thing, right?

That it’s a result of trying to capture verbal communication in written/visual form?

Guess we should get rid of spaces too, since that doesn’t reflect actual speech?

Put down the crack pipe, and step away from the computer.

Or (as others have said), “be the change you want to see”/“put your money where your mouth is”.

Lol, oh the irony of your hypocrisy is laughable

What?

These kinds of questions are meaningless.

Unless you meant it rhetorically.

You just noticed?