I wish they didn’t throw “think of the children” in there.

Yeah, I stuck with Windows Phone very nearly to the end, but the lack of apps just made it totally unsustainable for anyone with any kind of social life that extended beyond SMS and email.

Is there a tipping point where it’s a net loss? If I understand the protocols correctly, the whole back end federation part of the equation is push based, so if everyone was running their own instance, lemmy.ml would have to push every post to every individual instance in the network. At some point isn’t it more efficient to only have to serve posts when people come here to look at them?

You have to make a new account unfortunately.

I just tried it. No way I can fit 3 columns on a 16:9 4k monitor, which means the main window area is offset to one side, which would quickly drive me crazy. Same reason I have never understood the ultrawide trend. I have three monitors and it works a lot like your screenshot but way less cramped.

I’m a NASA software engineer writing spacecraft flight software. A few thoughts:

1. I’m not at JPL and I don’t know how religiously they follow these rules, but we really don’t. They’re not part of our official or unofficial standard practice. Indeed, I can’t even find a reference to the rules on nasa.gov
2. Most of these rules are considered obvious these days. Most of the rest we don’t follow either. (at least not absolutely)
3. This video critically misstates the rule about heap allocation, which is perhaps the most significant difference between how we write software and how non-safety critical systems are written. Dynamic allocation is allowed during initialization. This is a massive, massive difference in terms of how easy it is to write code compared to stack-only.
4. The video also misses the mark on preprocessor usage. Especially in C, you have very little choice but to rely on the preprocessor. We avoid it, but the kind of multi-path compilation he describes is necessary to enable thorough testing of the code.
5. We’re still human. Even where the rule is good and we follow it in principle, you will still find all too many exceptions in the actual code.

If you really want to see how the sausage is made, the software framework used by many NASA missions is open source and on GitHub.

No. I come here to interact with people. One of my favorite features here is the setting that lets me hide all bot accounts.

The same thing has happened in traditional professional sports in the past. The entire 2004-2005 season in the NHL was cancelled due to a labor dispute.

I think it could all be summed up with “options”. Everyone has their own idea of what a good UI is, so give use the tools to make the site work for us. For me it would be three things:

1. By far, the front page needs options to make it more compact. My current reddit front page fits more than twice as many links on a single screen (21 vs 9).
2. Make the center content area wider. I don’t want it to go all the way across the screen, but it’s to narrow on my 4k monitor.
3. Make the stuff to the right of the content area go all the way on the right of the screen. It’s distracting in its current position.

The only thing that I find mildly annoying is when using the site on desktop there’s a ton of white/dead space on the left and right margins.

I’ve seen this come up a ton, but what do you want instead? Pretty much every website limits line lengths on comments (for good reason) and it makes a lot more sense for the text to go in the middle of the screen than on the left IMO.

I do wish that the stuff to the right of the comments would anchor to the right side of the screen instead of the right side of the content area though.

Can you explain what the issue is? I think it’s all but inevitable that one server will become the “default” server that most people will create an account on first. As they learn more about how everything works, they may choose to create another account on a server with different rules that suite them better. That flow seems much easier to me than putting pressure on new users to pick the “right” server from them off the bat.

• Prehistoric C++: Core language for my main project at work. Unfortunately we’re stuck with C++98, but it’s still a massive improvement on C.
• C: For some of the older parts of the aforementioned project
• Python: For test automation for the aforementioned project, also rapidly becoming the main language within the community that covers my secondary work project. I used to really not care for Python, but to the extent it displaces MATLAB I’m 100% in favor of it. I’ve also grown to really like it in the test automation role. The only thing I could wish for is that it had a mode that required type hints across the board.
• Modern C++: Used for my other work project. While I do think that C++11 is a huge step up from C++98, I think the later standards have added a lot of cruft and very little value. Given the choice I would definitely take modern C++ over C++98, but I’d really rather be writing something like Rust
• Java: This was a mistake I made years ago when I started a project as a very junior developer. Unfortunately I work in a research context where even as the junior developer I was still the most experienced developer on the team when it came to some things. We needed a REST API for this project and doing it in C++ didn’t seem feasible at the time (no idea if it’s better now). Some other teams in my org where using Spring so I jumped on that bandwagon. In hindsight, I wish I had written the API in Python since we’re slowly moving a lot of our C++ code into Python on that project now.
• Shell: For automation that’s just a little too easy to bother with Python
• Rust: Only used on hobby projects for now, but it scratches the same itch as C++ a thousand times better. The language itself is wonderful once you get used to the borrow checker and cargo is an incredibly valuable part of the ecosystem as well.

Fried rice. It takes a good bit of technique, but I was able to practice a lot and get good at it while living somewhere where I had a high temperature wok burner. Now that I have the technique down, I can manage pretty well in an ordinary skillet on an electric stove, and it’s super easy and quick once you know what’ you’re doing.

Streaky bacon is just “bacon” to us Americans, right? I’m surprised none of the bacon goes in the loaf. Does the fat from the bacon penetrate into the loaf while baking? I would expect a 95% lean meatloaf to be quite dry.

I don’t think this is a real problem that people face. If all you want is to maintain your existing wealth, there are a wide range of very low risk options that will get you that. The overwhelming majority want to grow their wealth and take risks accordingly.

It will happen over time. Lemmy and Beehaw are still infinitesimally small compared to reddit. Trying to push people onto other servers right now is extreme premature optimization.

I’m not an economist, just a guy who took all of two econ classes in college. That said, I think there’s an obvious answer to that question. The inflation target is a target. Central banks can’t actually set inflation unilaterally, or we wouldn’t ever see the inflation rates we’ve seen over the last couple of years. This is why we target a small rate of inflation. It’s easy to look at a 2% inflation target in a highly inflationary environment and think that we should be targeting 0%, but we really don’t want deflation.

Not sure what a wealth tax has to do with anything. I’m not inherently against it, but I don’t think it has a significant impact on inflation.

Maybe it’s just because I never really “got” Twitter, but this seems like a boring tautological argument to me. A more interesting question would be whether we even care? Platforms come and go. For some reason people seem to have decided that platforms have gotten “too big to fail”, but it’s clearly not the case.

Your “hard currency” is inherently deflationary. This may seem good to you since it means your dollar is worth more tomorrow than it is today, but the same is true for everyone else’s dollars too. The net result is to discourage spending across the entire economy and that leads to much worst outcomes. There is a good reason that central banks aim for a small amount of inflation rather than zero or negative inflation.

There’s good reason for setting a maximum bound on the width though. It’s much harder on the eyes to read long lines of text. That said, I do think Lemmy goes a bit overboard, and I would really like to see all of the non-post content on the right side anchored to the right edge rather than centered.