It surely does. Check pirates post for clean math formatting

Apart from screaming case, which is for textual macros, i approve.

It is also a “refactoring”.

It is trivial arithmetic: 4.52403840*2160 ≈ 9 GB/ s. Not even close. Even worse, that cable will struggle to get ordinary 60hz 4k delivered.

Sekiro can jump, climb, grapple and swim. Those kinds of more agile behaviors add a lot requirements and considerations to the engine and content makers.

In many modern environments the second I start scrolling my eyes start to bleed. Yes, I want 60 fps min. That was the first part. The second part is about stability. 20 fps may be enough for typing, but it needs to be 20 fps all the time. Not the average between 1 and 60, it is makes IDEs unusable.

If FPS is NOT an important metric in text editing, you are doing something wrong. Otherwise, good points.

Ahh, it is the same thing. Rust example surely has some cruft, but mostly for the better. I’m sure not all of it is needed.

Computer science is a branch of math. And while it has applications in software, most developers do not interact with it, only using existing implementations of CS results.

Show the alternative, I’ll have a good laugh.

Move the wheel under the thumb. Until then it’s anything but ergonomic.

Exactly. If you are a coder and care about ergonomics of layouts, get split programmable keyboard, do not try to find good layout for normal keyboard, they do not exist. I personally do not like the particular keyboard at the picture, but there are many others to choose from and find a good fit for everyone.

On a side note, “jokes for 300” is a template response for joke, referencing to a lockal jeopardy! show equivalent. This response means that joke was mediocre at best.

They also have an audacity to call these 6 inchers “compact”.

Correspondence is quite a weak relation. Very far from one being another.

I don’t think you understand how percentage works.

Proofs can be represented as programs, not the other way around. Also, USA allows for algorithm parents, and algorithms are maths. While I agree with you, your reasoning is not correct.

Screen sizes, presence and size of notches, and available APIs between OS versions.

Ahh, no. The window where existed only one iPhone and you could develop for it was very narrow. And then you need not only develop for different hardware, but software as well. Yes, different versions of iOS are different. Source: developers for mobile for three years.

Side wheels? It is more like “you get in through the hatch, we do not have doors”.