It’s like it’s leaping out of the page.

Dunno about the user you asked, but I’ve used Bandcamp for that.

That correlates much more closely with agriculture than oil. Compare this map with one for arable land. Lots of the AB, SK, MB area covered in roads are also covered in farms, while large parts of that area does not have significant oil industry.

It’s certainly lower than the 20-30% game distribution platforms take.

I can pretty much guarantee the server & staff costs are more than 1% of sticker price, especially since BC includes streaming services.

The barycenter is sometimes outside the diameter of the sun. Not always, and I believe not even usually.

Yes, today I’m being that guy. Still a cool factoid.

❤️ btop. Lots of info, it’s pretty, and it can run in headless environments too.

This, tbh. I did not have this on my 2025 bingo card…

They also have dev/art teams orders of magnitudes larger than Team Cherry. (I do agree with your sentiment about useless managers and execs, of course.)

It does depend on the disease and the vaccine.

Usually, yes, vaccinated people can still carry and transmit the disease. However, they’re much more likely to have less severe or even no symptoms, and for many diseases they’re also much less likely to transmit than an unvaccinated person.

The real answer to your question is: the more people that are vaccinated, the safer everyone is. It is the height of self-centered self-importance for anti-vaxers to consider their right to avoid minor side effects as more important than the health and safety - potentially even the life - of the immunocompromised people in their community.

Fortunately not. But even in Canada, minimum wage is abysmal.

The federal minimum wage only applies to federally regulated industries, such as telecoms or banking.

https://minwage-salairemin.service.canada.ca/en/general.html

I think that’s a bad idea, both legally and ethically. Vehicles cause tens of thousands of deaths - not to mention injuries - per year in North America. You’re proposing that a company who can meet that standard is absolved of liability? Meet, not improve.

In that case, you’ve given these companies license to literally make money off of removing responsibility for those deaths. The driver’s not responsible, and neither is the company. That seems pretty terrible to me, and I’m sure to the loved ones of anyone who has been killed in a vehicle collision.

He guy continues to level up his mad genius game, wow.

That’s measuring airflow required, which is not equivalent to energy required.

It’s very worth noting that this kind of a system is actually much more cost efficient than vaccinating the birds. Vaccinating is very expensive when you consider the logistics of injecting the volume of birds we’re talking about. IIRC Canada consumes around a million chickens per week.

Part of this is a debate on what the definition of intelligence and/or consciousness is, which I am not qualified to discuss. (I say “discuss” instead of “answer” because there is not an agreed upon answer to either of those.)

That said, one of the main purposes of AGI would be able to learn novel subject matter, and to come up with solutions to novel problems. No machine learning tool we have created so far is capable of that, on a fundamental level. They require humans to frame their training data by defining what the success criteria is, or they spit out the statistically likely human-like response based on all of the human-generated content they’ve consumed.

In short, they cannot understand a concept that humans haven’t yet understood, and can only echo solutions that humans have already tried.

25% might be what comes off your pay cheque, sure. That’s not actually how much income tax most people end up paying. How big of a refund did you get this year?

Single-payer meducal systems are objectively less expensive than the US’s ludicrous system. Americans pay the highest per-capita for medical care in the developed world by a huge margin. Technically it’s not taxes, but that’s because it’s directly feeding corporate profits. It’s still effectively mandatory cost of living.

Every credit card company charges large fees to the service provider for charge backs. It’s standard practice. This is also leads to service providers straight up perma-banning customers who initiate charge backs instead of resolving a dispute with the provider.

This. This would actually help. I like schadenfreude as much as the next guy, but if all you do is point and laugh then you’re only serving to further isolate these people and leave them vulnerable to the next line of propaganda.