The big problem is AI will (eventually) “see” things as a human does so even in the case that these MIT researchers are able to insert nearly invisible artifacts that fool AI into thinking the edges are different than they actually are, a sufficiently large training set will allow the AI to see that the color borders are more important than artifact borders…

Which will allow AI to bypass this type of watermarking.

We all want a nude Tayne.

This is definitely interesting… However I would caveat this with the fact that in the past, Nature & Science have both previously published more than their fair share of studies that would later be retracted for lack of reproducibility.

Most of this is due to the fact that when you’re a publication on the bleeding edge and there’s a lot of mid-term name and career recognition that comes with being published there, there’s also a higher level of academic fraud that can happen to get there.

I would keep a cautious eye out for retractions as well as labs that attempt to reproduce results… I also want to dig deeper and see if the mouse studies done had replication attempts by different labs as well and I won’t have a ton of time to do that today, but regardless it’s certainly a potentially a large breakthrough in cognition if it holds up.

"Then you will see it is not the paperclip that bends…

It is only yourself."

With the API shutting down, I believe there is no longer an automated way to delete all content. I would focus more attention on the latter suggestion.

Definitely the original portal.

I’m generally not an FPS guy, but the puzzle game in the FPS format was really cool to see.

And when you finally do beat the game you can’t help but think…

“This is a triumph”