

The most anticapitalist instance getting a .com domain would be hilarious
But there gotta be more to the story. Was the registrar being “shady” as @hendrik@palaver.p3x.de said? Why did federation take so long?
The most anticapitalist instance getting a .com domain would be hilarious
But there gotta be more to the story. Was the registrar being “shady” as @hendrik@palaver.p3x.de said? Why did federation take so long?
The link is helpful. Thanks!
deleted by creator
Thanks! The link is helpful.
Look like they got the domain back a while ago. Wonder why federation took so long.
Sorry I should have clarified: not looking for Hexbear lore in general. I have seen a lot of Hexbear content, so I have a solid understanding on the site and the users. Don’t want to start a debate about that here because that debate always turn nasty.
What I am looking for is: what happened in the past month-ish? How did you all lost your domain? How and when did you get it back? Why did it take so long for federation to be back? Is there any other change made to the site during this downtime?
I recommend critically reading the paper. It is quite accessible to those with college-level science background.
Most importantly, it is still highly controversial whether this galaxy rotation direction bias actually exists. If you look at section 4 of the paper, the author is debating against different groups that did similar surveys and found no bias. Someone needs to actually work through this author’s methodology as well as those of other groups and figure out what is going on.
If there is indeed a bias, that is super exciting! An anisotropic universe due to being in a black hole would be a very cool explanation. But given the ongoing debate, a general-audience publication like Independent presenting this rotation bias as a given fact is very poor journalism.
If only the new US regime could copy from the PRC by funding and promoting scientific research😔
Data sent entirely in the clear occurs during the initial registration of the app, including:
- organization id
- the version of the software development kit used to create the app
- user OS version
- language selected in the configuration
Doesn’t like very important information. Anyway, if you care about privacy you should not be using the official app or API. Go on OpenRouter and use DeepSeek models served by other inference providers with better privacy policies.
As stupid as that sounds, you are not totally wrong.
@don@lemm.ee and @kopasz7@sh.itjust.works you are misunderstanding what “observable universe” means. The observable universe is defined by the particle horizon, but the universe that can affect us in the future is defined by the event horizon. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_horizon says
The particle horizon differs from the cosmic event horizon, in that the particle horizon represents the largest comoving distance from which light could have reached the observer by a specific time, while the cosmic event horizon is the largest comoving distance from which light emitted now can ever reach the observer in the future.
But even the cosmological event horizon distance is dependent on our model of the universe’s expansion, which in turn depends on the content of the universe. An event such as a vacuum collapse will drastically alter the content and the expansion rate, rendering our calculation of the event horizon invalid. So “snap changes…” may in fact be the case.
It kinda works you just gotta be careful with what you use and keep some human in the loop curating the outputs.
This meme was about training on model outputs. But would be nice if they got some trade secrets as well. Intellectual property is cancer and these IP-stealing Chinese companies, if they exist, are doing god’s work 😊 hope Indian companies steal from China next as well
That’s why I wanted to confirm what you are using lol. Some people on Reddit were claiming the full thing, when run locally, has very little censorship. It sounds somewhat plausible since the web version only censors content after they’re generated.
You’re probably running one of the distillations then, not the full thing?
I just really hope the 2023 “I asked ChatGPT <abc> and it said <xyz>!!!” posts don’t make a comeback. They are low-effort and meaningless.
@jerryh100@lemmy.world Wrong community for this kind of post.
@BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one Can you share more details on installing it? Are you using SGLang or vLLM or something else? What kind of hardware do you have that can fit the 600B model? What is your inference tok/s?
Here’s a better media coverage of the same paper https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00030-5
I think we just differ on the terminology of invention versus observation. What draws the line between a well-supported theory and an observation in the end comes down to how tangible you think the data is.
The ball can quantum mechanically tunnel out to the true minimum. In this sense the local minimum is actually not perfectly stable.
I must admit I don’t know that much about MOND being tested. But yeah, from a Lambda CDM point of view it is unsurprising that MOND would not work well for every galaxy.
Did they end up choosing block list or allow list? I hope it was the former. Allowlist will exclude small instances and harm federation diversity.