• dominoko@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The range for livable temperatures follows a more reasonable scale. Hot is really high numbers. Cold is low. The exact temperature is more precise because the range is larger.
    Celsius is fine for scientists but for the regular person Fahrenheit has a better range.
    Also I’m biased.

    • I’m also biased.

      But:

      • Celsius is easy to understand, even for children: water freezes at 0°C, boils at 100°C.
      • It is understood by more people in the world.
      • If the US used Celsius, understanding scientific papers and data would be easier for common people.
      • In Celsius, the range of livable temperatures for humans (-20 to 40°C) still gives plenty of precision. Additionally, each step in the Celsius scale corresponds to a bigger change in “feel” of the temperature, which leads to a more intuitive understanding of temperature changes.
      • dominoko@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your first 3 points, I can agree with. We will have to agree to disagree on the last one.

          • Daydreamy@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            As someone who uses their thermostat and regularly switches between 72 and 75, yes. Yes I can.

            • buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fake thermostats which exist solely to give the occupants of office buildings an illusion of control are an entire product category. If I were to replace your thermostat with one without your knowledge, you would be just as happy turning it up and down all day.