• damipereira@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if they do, they would not be able to force instance owners to update to the closed version. And people would take over the last available open source version and fork it. Also, a closed and open source version could co-exist, since the api is open.

    • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they went closed source that would mean they would have a similar situation to Emby. They went closed source after a time which gave rise to people forking the last public build and making Jellyfin which is an excellent alternative.

    • Maiznieks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Protocol is open, anyone can rewrite a federation client that pulls data off proprietary servers as a last resort. This is why federation is great. Besides, you can’t close an open source project, you have to create new, closed parts to have them. That’s how mariadb and galera took a chunk off mysql user base and how libreoffice became a successor of openoffice.

      As a side note, I wish we could move accounts and even communities between instances, based on some kind of two way handshake agreement.

      • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right? Currently if an instance fails then all the communities hosted on that instance and comments are essentially ‘gone’ correct?