show transcript
chirasul posted:
my only advice is to BE CAREFUL posting about holiday traditions around europeans. you’ll post something casual like “anyone else watch the old Grinch movie every year? what a classic” and a european will appear as if summoned and say some shit like “funny how USAmericans always CONVENIENTLY forget that Not Everyone On Earth is from The USA……… no of COURSE we dont watch ‘the grunch’ or whatever the fuck that is…. our tradition is to attend a community showing of Glummdorf the Racial Stereotype”
themainspoon replies with screenshots of several tumblr tags and comments:
riseupriseupandcomealong:
my mom’s (american) class tried doing a language exchange thing w a sister school in spain and they decided to send each other boxes of gifts for christmas. the spanish class made remarks about oh christmas in the usa is so commercialized we have ~real traditions~ here and then my mom opened a box full of blackface dolls and blackface doll ornaments and blackface clothespins in front of her students
raygender:
Did once have a Dutch woman
vehemently defend the Festive Christmas Blackface by repeating "it’s different in Europe” with increasing desperation until she was crying. Literally all anybody else present did was just like, calmly say they were uncomfortable with the practice and not change her mind when she wailed about it.
monkey-mulch:
you bring up rudolph the red nosed reindeer and they bring out Skimbo the filthy redskin and im barely even joking about that they actually had this thing called indian plays in both soviet countries and germany
themainspoon:
European children waiting patiently on Hatemas Eve for Racism Claus to slur down the chimney and segregate all of their presents by colour.
Minor correction: racist blackface black Pete isn’t a Christmas tradition. Also, we’ve had a big national talk about it, and now the only people who actually do blackface are the actual racists and the rest of us hate them.
On the Three Magi Day, we see lots of children playing them and caroling in an official charity event. Yes, Balthasar often has dark makeup to more closely match his historical depiction and it’s not racist. (I have talked to the single Black person in my town and they don’t mind.) We just can’t ship enough real Blacks in to play the third of the Magi for this one day. And yes, the Czech song is 50% basically “- Why are you black?” “- It’s the sun.”
Black people are a bit of a curiosity much like in the Middle Ages, and the attitude hasn’t changed much. It’s only people in Prague who are indifferent (except they will default to English), people outside Prague are like “what brought you here?” “oh, interesting”. The real racism is against the Romani and Muslims: most people will think “this guy is here to steal stuff / blow something up” but in Prague they will keep it to themselves.
Edit: Looks like this is unrelated to “Black Pete”, we don’t have that here
Yeah it’s Sinterklaas day on the 6th, right?
One of my Dutch coworkers always brought in chocolates. He said that once at Philips he played one of Pieter’s countrymen for the company event (yes in full makeup).
That was a while ago tho…
It’s on December 5th.
As a Dutch person who grew up with this tradition, the tradition doesn’t have all the same racist connotations that historical blackface does. “Zwarte Piet” isn’t put in a bad light but as an approachable friend who brings children gifts. I personally never experienced him as a negative stereotype in any way. There’s been plenty of attempts to tie his origins to slavery or denigrating racist stereotypes, but historians just don’t really find conclusive evidence for that. The reason seems to be more like “just cause” rather than some racist reasoning. He just sort of “popped up”, people liked the character so he stuck around.
Nonetheless, some people are uncomfortable with it. And I don’t think changing the colour of his skin should matter all that much. The story told to kids was that he’s only black due to all the chimney soot (which he climbs through to deliver presents), but a couple years the national broadcaster had a story (there’s a sort of “Sinterklaas News” programme for kids with a new exciting story each year for why this time maybe you won’t get presents but at the last moment everything works out anyway) where the boat that Sinterklaas and the Pieten take from Spain to the Netherlands sailed through a rainbow, so now all the Pieten have all kinds of different rainbow colours instead of black. They ditched some of the other stereotypical stuff (like the bright red lips and earrings) quietly because kids don’t notice nor care about that.
I don’t agree that celebrating with Zwarte Piet (Black Pete) makes someone a racist. It’s an old tradition people were born into, it’s just normal to them and people certainly don’t typically celebrate with Zwarte Piet in order to be negative towards people of colour in any way. Hell, the Netherlands is fairly well known for being tolerant.
I do however agree that if someone asks to change it because it’s uncomfortable, that getting angry about it and deliberately not changing it because of “muh traditions” certainly does seem quite racist. Piet being black is just a detail, it’s not part of the core of the tradition. Like, are these people in the pocket of “big black makeup” or something? Just make them all kinds of colours, looks a lot more cheerful too imo. Thankfully the country is moving away from him being black so hopefully in the future the debate can be laid to rest.
Zwarte Piet in itself is not that bad of a story for children, but you could just use ash as makeup to suggest the scenario instead of whatever this abomination is
Black curly wig, obvious blackface, the golden hoop earrings 😭… Zwarte Piet has been used as a racial stereotype since the late 19th century - it only got worse during the 20th century - even if its origins were originally different and imo needs to be changed (as has been tried and partially succeeded)
Yeh his origins are all over the place and combine in a pretty terrible way. Changing it is for the better.
Sinterklaas supposedly lives in Spain, and some origins suggest Piet is modelled off of Moorish slaves there. But the outfit doesn’t match; it’s based on traditional Moorish outfits as they wore in Venice, and those Moors were free. The bright colours are also reminiscent of the southern Dutch as well as the Venetian carnival.
Decades ago, Piet would announce himself with the clanking of chains. That makes people think of slavery, but they’re not chains as used to bind slaves. Rather, it appears to be coming from the German Krampus, which is more of a boogeyman that scares kids. Piet then changed to make him a friendly and non-scary alternative to Krampus.
Piet has always been described as a “knecht”, which some people interpret as “slave” but that’s a bad translation of the world. A knecht is just someone who helps with some task, and who does just get paid for it like with any other job. A farmhand for example could be a type of knecht, and they aren’t slaves either.
Combined together, it’s the perfect cocktail of “it looks terrible, but does seem coincidental”. Refusing to change it because of “tradition” when people who are uncomfortable kindly ask to do so, that does appear to be the most racist thing about him.
Ngl, I’m impressed.
Dutch guy here. Our racist saint Nicolas “Sinterklaas” with blackface “zwarte Piet” isn’t Christmas celebration. He arrives in November and celebrates his birthday on the 5th of December by giving gifts to children.
All aspects from American Christmas celebration were stolen from European traditions. The story from Scandinavia, the character from Germany, the name from the Netherlands. But the Dutch tradition isn’t Christmas. It’s racist though, not arguing that. I’m fighting it though, because fuck racism. Also the racist part is only recent, back in the old days “zwarte Piet” was a white guy with black soot all over him from climbing through the chimney. Later it became a caricature black person which is so fucked up.
Sadly there’s a lot of systematic racism deeply nestled in European cultures and traditions. Slowly we are working to getting rid of them, although there are also many fighting to keep them. But luckily we’re making progress.
But if we’re pointing fingers here, at least we’re not celebrating genocide every year by slaughtering insane amounts of turkeys with Thanksgiving 👀
They weren’t stolen, they’re descended from. Because white Americans aren’t native to the Americas and brought their traditions with them.
It was kind of a big thing, history wise?
Because the states were new and full of mixed cultures, they desperately created national holidays to create a more general national feeling among the wide variety of people. Many were hand picked, to create a national culture as the states had none. It’s all to create unity and identity.
You mean people in America or the church in Europe? Or is that the joke
Nvm, I can’t read
Dutch girl here,
The celebration of “Sinterklaas” leaving started with people from Zeeland celebrating that their children weren’t kidnapped by the slaves(most black, also some white) of a white dude who came by ship to bring mandarins.
I don’t know where your heard that story, but it’s completely false. See This Wikipedia page with a detailed history story. This Wikipedia story is confirmed by many other sources. I haven’t found any credible source supporting your claim.
nervously puts his Lumumba away
for those who don’t know: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumumba_(drink)
I’m totally calling it “tote Tante” from now on.
I’m an immigrant in Germany who thought that was just a normal word for spiked hot cocoa 😬
You got that in common with most native Germans until maybe a few years ago.
you bring up rudolph the red nosed reindeer and they bring out Skimbo the filthy redskin and im barely even joking about that they actually had this thing called indian plays in both soviet countries and germany
IDK about the soviet union, but “indian plays” are not a (common) christmas tradition in Germany. I’ve never even heard of those.
@OP thanks for adding the transcription.
Which European country was it that added a loophole to their constitution to allow slavery as punishment then manipulated their legal system to lock a third of black men up again? I forget.
France.
Now now, The French Foreign Legion isn’t slavery. It will just make you wish for nuclear winter.
Can we not try to avoid introspection into our own racism by talking about someone else’s racism please?
Yes, this is a fucked up thing. Why do you specifically bring it up under a post about European racism tho?
On the one hand, it’s bait.
On the other hand I don’t think the country that has formalised slavery and a culture of policing which views it’s own citizens as prey really has the right to dictate conversation on race relations.
In no other field would such failure be seen as authority. You wouldn’t pick a garage to fix your car because them accidentally destroying the most engines shows they’re experts.
I disagree strongly with this sentiment. If there was one garage that was destroying engines and another garage removing all the seatbelts, sure, maybe engine-estroying-garage has their own shit going on, but that doesn’t mean that their critisism of seatbelt-removing-garage is invalid.
“my culture can’t have racist elements because your culture is racister!”
truly a smackdown, i am humbled.
Well, you didn’t come with actual arguments, so I guess you are humbled.
I’m really glad we’re doing all that and this is your takeaway because that gives Europeans like yourself every excuse to do nothing. It’s okay for me to trip on this rake because somewhere an American is tripping on their rake harder.
You’re on a thread that’s effectively saying America doesn’t have racist traditions like Europe does. The comment above just calmly points out that we do, and some of it is part of our existing legal system. You don’t get to insult Europeans (in a way that seems to at least in part be made up) and then get angry when someone points out very legitimate real racism that actually effects a large number of people’s lives.
I paired down a much cruder response initially to just what you read because I thought about it and realized this was the case. I still find it disgusting to use whataboutism to ignore Europe’s racism. If your answer to is to shrug off your own country’s white supremacism because America is worse that’s bullshit. It isn’t as enlightened as you think it is.
You’re on a thread that’s effectively saying America doesn’t have racist traditions like Europe does.
[citation needed]
this post is about holiday traditions specifically, like that’d the first sentence.
at no point did anyone say america isn’t racist.believe it or not, every western culture is racist in some way to some group.
Every culture, not just the western ones.
yea, but i’m not well versed in eastern racisms so i’m not gonna talk about them
Imagine being from the UK and thinking it is some superior country. You’re literally a top contender for the worst group of human beings to have ever existed.
I personally don’t think the sins of the father pass to the son, because that’s what stupid assholes who haven’t developed second order thought think, so maybe consider refering to the nation as a concept instead of every living or dead Brit.
So…exactly what the person I was responding to did…interesting.
Ah, Europeans always love to hoist racism over Americans.
Forget stones, y’all have whole-ass machine guns in those glass houses.
I’m an American.
What the fuck is this thread? Americans can insult European racism, but a European can’t point out American racism?
I think the issue on this instance is that the original is bringing up America’s racism as a way to dismiss their own.
The war on Christmas isn’t real but I wish it was
Lets nuke the shit out of the shitty parts but keep the decorated live tree, pretty lights, egg nog, giving poor people and or family members things they cant normally afford and radicalizing our younger family members to be anarchistic leftists over ham or turkey or Chinese food while your older relatives try to push them as far right as possible and complain about everything that comes out of your mouth. You know the good parts of Christmas.
and people wonder why we Russians stick to secular New Year instead of returning to actual Christmas like an actual Christian country would
this is genuinely a lot of what i see christmas being here in sweden, in gothenburg they even have a special old tram that goes around before christmas collecting donated presents for poor families to give their kids. There’s clearly a desire in a significant portion of the population to kick the commercialism to the wayside and just go back to focusing on things being cozy and compassionate.
My Christmas tradition has the Krampus. He’s both not racist and a terrifying monster. I’d call that a holiday tradition jackpot.
Are demons a race or a species?
Krampus does have an unfortunate history of people beating each other up, though. And by “history” I mean “In many places it was the norm until a few years ago, and lots of people didn’t get the memo yet and assault people who wear Krampus suits during parades etc.”.
In my hometown, we never had Krampus parades and it was more like children and Krampus pranking each other.
The parades are already the relatively modern, watered-down/‘family-friendly’ version of the old tradition.
The thing about pranks is that people don’t tend to agree on what is okay for a prank. One person’s funny prank might be another person’s violent assault, same with how the Krampus is allowed to ‘retaliate’.
they actually had this thing called indian plays in both soviet countries and germany
Americans are so racist they have to fabricate nonexistent racist stuff elsewhere to feel better about their own racism. Impressive.
Germany literally has a children’s game called “Who’s Afraid of the Black Man”
I don’t wanna hear about Racism being a “uniquely American problem”
Cause it very clearly is not.
School shootings and medical debt however ARE “uniquely American problems”
That’s based on the black death, aka. the plague, hence the rules of the game.
We have enough rascist shit in our culture but this one isn’t :)
I actually didnt knew that.Thanks. :)
Looking back as an adult the origin is clearly racist. But since I sung that in kindergarden myself: We didn’t associate “black man” with a person of colour. When I was 4, I was imagining some creep in a black trenchcoat.
It’s seen as an American problem because America is one of the most multicultural countries in the world. It’s not surprising you don’t hear about racism much in countries with 80%+ white populations
I learned pretty recently that the “black man” is actually supposed to either be the plague/death or some kind of boogeyman.
Here in Finland, it used to be “kuka pelkää mustaa miestä” which means the same thing, but was later switched to “kuka pelkää mustekalaa” (mustekala=octopus/squid) because, well, that name didn’t work too well when kids started to actually see black men.
That being said, racism seems to be one of the most popular pastimes in Europe.
I loved grinch back in the nineties.
Nirvana and all that.
Like… everything that happened in Europe culturally in the 90s was derived from America, even waay into the 00s, and the 10s, and the - y’know what, they’ve colonised our culture (nevermind that ours was so permeable that we just lapped it all up)! Now I hate The Muppets, and The Grinch Who Stole Christmas, and it was one of my favourite movies while growing up!
When did you say we’re celebrating Hatemas Eve again, because sign me tf up!
(/s, of course)
Colonial culture has defined and permeated European culture since forever.
That was the impulse behind my joke, pot calling the kettle black and all that… Didn’t mean to imply any different, we started the whole mess after all…
To be fair, lots of influence came from the US and UK in the nineties. Lots of good stuff!
If I’m angry at something silly it would be coca cola santa lol 😁
OP: posts a meme about weird and racist European holiday traditions and how Europeans will appear to defend them
Europeans ITT:
well actually it’s not a Christmas tradition it’s from November
yeah uh, and it’s not actually blackface because we decided it’s soot and ash even though it was and still is blackface
ok we might have people here that like the blackface but they live all the way on the other side of the country which is like a whole 10 minutes away so it doesn’t count
uhhhh you Americans wouldn’t understand with your newer, watered-down, holiday traditions that are stolen from elsewhere
it’s not racist it’s cultural and you Americans would understand if you could introspect about your culture
fucking Thank You.
whenever i post something like this i always hope people here would be at least marginally more willing to engage with them than the average person seeing how left-leaning they tend to be and i’m always proven wrong
logically i know they’re a minority, most people don’t even comment, but still.
never expected to see someone say “i don’t care if it’s racist it’s my culture so It Stays” here. like do you not hear yourself??We have been transitioning to “soot” smears rather than full-on blackface and red lipstick, which has been very welcome. Yet some people hate it vehemently, “it’s a festival for the children, they don’t understand the racist implications so we don’t need to change it!” (the latter part isn’t generally spoken out loud).
in the Netherlands we have a guy named Saint Nicholas that gave money to prostitudes and other poor people to save them, who then decided to join him. The best translation for their names i have is ‘squires’ but not really. Because they go down our chimneys to deliver gifts it’s tradition for them to have ash on their face, which some are calling blackface.
Roetveegpiet seems to only have come about because of the blackface issue with Zvarte Piet, which was originally portrayed as a moor said to be a literal slave to Sinterklaas. Sooty Piet only got more popular than Black Piet in 2021., going from polls.
I’ve always heard that they were black because of the ashes. and, the original original Sinterklaas rescued prostitudes
every source on the internet will tell you that the soot thing is from like the 90s at the earliest.
Dutch Wikipedia has the first references to blackness from soot pinned to an image from the 1870s:
“Zwarte Piet had in deze tijd nog niet zijn huidige naam; zo is hij op een centsprent uit 1870 afgebeeld als een schoorsteenveger met de naam Zwartjan.” https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet#:~:text=Zwarte Piet had in deze tijd nog niet zijn huidige naam%3B zo is hij op een centsprent uit 1870 afgebeeld als een schoorsteenveger met de naam Zwartjan.
Translates to: "Black Pete did not have his current name yet, he was depicted on an image from the 1870s as a chimney sweeper named “Black Jan” (Jan is a stereotypically Dutch name, one of the most common Dutch first names. Pete, or Piet in Dutch, is also a very common Dutch name).
i should have switched languages, there is of course more nuance in the original article. i’m reading a translated version so i may be missing something but “black jan” seems to be a reference to Jan Schenkman, the author. and although it is indeed stated that he had no intention of it being a depiction of a black person, the zeitgeist seems to have willed it into that shape anyway. after that section, the next reference to soot is in the early 1900s (not the 1990s as i read from the english page though). it does look like the soot explanation was the less popular one until fairly recently though.
The name is a reference to Schenkman, but it did refer to the same character.
Piet’s origins are all over the place, and form a perfect cocktail of “it looks bad, but the explanation is fairly innocent”. There’s elements from chimney sweepers, traditional Venetian Moorish outfits, German Krampus, the practical element of having black makeup making a close relative hard to recognize for children, etc… that all combined without much of a clear decision-making process. It all happened very gradually and naturally within Dutch society.
Hopefully we’ll have this changed everywhere soon enough, though there are still some conservative areas that resist the change.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet
Sounds like you’re referring to the recent (2021) version, “Sooty Pete” but Black Pete has a couple hundred years on him.
I’ve always heard that they were black because of the ashes. and, the original original Sinterklaas rescued prostitudes
… so… why do they wear curly wigs?
… and put on red lipstick?
Does soot make your hair curly and lips extra red?
You forgot the golden hoop earrings 😂
Because they go down our chimneys to deliver gifts it’s tradition for them to have ash on their face, which some are calling blackface.
This was made up later because people were too uncomfortable with it, this was not the original story.
Dutch Wikipedia has the first references to blackness from soot pinned to an image from the 1870s:
“Zwarte Piet had in deze tijd nog niet zijn huidige naam; zo is hij op een centsprent uit 1870 afgebeeld als een schoorsteenveger met de naam Zwartjan.” https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet#:~:text=Zwarte Piet had in deze tijd nog niet zijn huidige naam%3B zo is hij op een centsprent uit 1870 afgebeeld als een schoorsteenveger met de naam Zwartjan.
Translates to: "Black Pete did not have his current name yet, he was depicted on an image from the 1870s as a chimney sweeper named “Black Jan” (Jan is a stereotypically Dutch name, one of the most common Dutch first names. Pete, or Piet in Dutch, is also a very common Dutch name).
Fun post justification for characters originally based on black slaves.
the original original Sinterklaas was a guy that rescued prostitudes
When do I arm my strategic bomber for the War on Christmas? 🛫💣🎄🎇
Sorry but the comment about the films is horseshit
2024 will mark about two decades of sitting through Home Alone and Die Hard, and before that it was two decades of Shitty Shitty Bang Bang (thanks autocorrect 😂) and The Wizard of Oz
Quite looking forward to the new Wallace and Gromit though!
In some parts of Germany, the gifts are coming from the “Christ’s child” which is an angel, a child, Jesus as a kid, all of them? I am from Germany, and I still don’t know.
It’s obviously child Jesus. It’s not “Christ’s child”, it’s “Christ (the) child”.
Sure, better use child-jesus, the adult one would make everyone sad, especially because he loses the gifts through the holes in his hand. /s