• A7thStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    You don’t straw buy an AR then pick it up and cross state lines with it going to a known chaotic protest without premeditated “self defence”.

    • Jamablaya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah and you don’t get acquitted of that either. Also one of the surviving “victims” doesn’t blow the prosecution’s case by being honest in your scenario. That look of defeat photo is priceless.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Carrying a gun is “premeditated self defence”? Are people only supposed to carry guns where it is safe? What is the purpose of that?

      So many people pushing this ridiculous idea he is guilty for not staying at home, quaking in his boots. Right to self defense and to bear arms literally exist so that people don’t have to fear walking outside because of asshat violent criminals and rioters.

      And even more ridiculous saying the police and prosecutors didn’t care. What do you mean? They went after him with everything they had. It was a jury of his peers that told them to f off with that shit.

      But I guess lemmy only likes juries if they nullify actual murderers they like, not when they let go an innocent person they don’t like. (I don’t like Rittenhouse either, but that does not make him a murderer.)

      • GNUTup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I remember when I was a freshman in high school, I worked at a McDonald’s. For whatever reason, I owned a Burger King t shirt. As a 14 year old, I thought it would be funny to wear the Burger King shirt to work. I figured it would annoy my boss and might get a few reactions out of other people. It didn’t work, but there were no real consequences because of it.

        You really can’t see how Rittenhouse did a similar thing? He went to a protest knowing he was diametrically opposite, politically, to people actually protesting and he did it with a big ass gun. Like my Burger King t shirt, this was very clearly sending a message of “I am your enemy.” And the message wasn’t on a harmless shirt, it was on a deadly big ass gun.

        You really truly believe he had no intention of killing? Are you dumb?

          • GNUTup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Rittenhouse was not a cop, he was a douchebag little shit stirrer with a murder fantasy, and he got exactly what he wanted — a fun murder spree killing liberals with no consequences.

            I’m not going to coordinate an effort to lynch the piece of shit, but spreading bullshit about how “he’s not a murderer,” like what you’re doing, is disingenuous at best. Kindly, shut the fuck up

              • GNUTup@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Violent bloodthirsty evil thug, then. Is that better for you, Herr Pedant?

                  • GNUTup@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Orchestrating a scenario in which the only possible outcome is self-defense by deadly force sounds an awful lot like premeditated murder, to me. I think you should reevaluate what you consider pedantry.

              • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                It was not murder, since murder means killing illegally

                You could have picked from so many different reasons to why this was not murder, but this one takes the cake.

                I have another one!

                Murder is a crime, and Criminals are in Jail.

                Since he is not, it could not have been murder! CHECKMATE LIBERALS /s

      • Zement@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Everything they had? He’s still alive. That’s more than most shooters get.