In the wake of the killing, widespread public animosity towards health insurers ― and UnitedHealthcare specifically ― may explain why the company quickly limited who could comment on their tribute to Thompson.

Still, people still found a way to express how they felt ― to the tune of more than 90,000 laughing reactions as of Friday.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Right well we certainly agree on the definition. I was just pointing out how dumb it is that it spawned a thread. But I’m obviously at least half responsible for that aspect

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Haha! True, true. It’s the internet though. If someone posts something, it will most assuredly be argued by someone else. Is there a rule for this? I feel like there should be a rule for this.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah. There definitely should be such a rule/law, if there isn’t. Reminds me of the recent post that said “wikipedia rebuilt the library of Alexandria powered solely by nerds’ need to correct each other”