Daylighting, which involves removing parked cars from around crosswalks in order to improve visibility and just wiped out about 14,000 street parking spaces, has proved especially controversial.

“If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer,” Nina Geneson Otis wrote in an email to The Standard. The real estate broker said daylighting is the kind of policy that makes Democrats lose elections.

Others say the city’s actions remove responsibility from pedestrians to look out for their own safety. “A pedestrian can do anything, and be irresponsible, and no harm will come to them?” Brandi said, describing the policies as “idiot-proof.”

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    3 days ago

    “If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer” is such a wild thing to say oh my god. Yeah, thats the point. Less people die because of it.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      “If someone doesn’t die because of it, we will never know, while the living have to suffer"

      Man, I could not have done a better job of distilling the effects of the toxic “rugged individualism” ingrained in American culture down to a single sentence…

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Especially after we all saw what they mean by the living “having to suffer,” during COVID. The “suffering” of having to wear a mask. The “suffering” of maybe getting a perfectly safe vaccine in order to protect yourself and others (including people you don’t know and will never meet, wow imagine that)…

          But hey, it means that I don’t have to pay for some homeless person’s health care through my income tax, so worth it amirite?