Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week’s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      fuck me that is some awful fucking moderation. I can’t imagine being so fucking bad at this that I:

      • dole out a ban for being rude to a fascist
      • dole out a second ban because somebody in the community did some basic fucking due diligence and found out one of the accounts defending the above fascist has been just a gigantic racist piece of shit elsewhere, surprise
      • in the process of the above, I create a safe space for a fascist and her friends

      but for so many of these people, somehow that’s what moderation is? fucking wild, how the fuck did we get here

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Post by Corbet the editor. “We get it: people wish that we had not highlighted work by this particular author. Had we known more about the person in question, we might have shied away from the topic. But the article is out now, it describes a bit of interesting technology, people have had their say, please let’s leave it at that.”

      So you updated the article to reflect this right? padme.jpg

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        so is corbet the same kind of fucker that’ll complain “everything is so political nowadays”? it seems like they are