fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoCall memander.xyzimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1281arrow-down12
arrow-up1279arrow-down1imageCall memander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareIrritableOcelot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoNope. RNA is chemically different: different sugar in the backbone, and there are wayyyy more than 4 RNA bases (like 12 iirc)
minus-squarenislinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoNice. I learned something new today 🙂 Not sure where I picked up my belief that RNA was just one side of DNA.
minus-squareIrritableOcelot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoIt is how it’s generally taught in schools, which is unfortunate.
minus-squareDragonsInARoom@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 days agoYes, some viruses are single strand RNA (+ssRNA or -ssRNA) the textbook Microbiology: with Diseases by Taxonomy by Robert W Bauman is a good reference with a section for both. (Does have sqeemish pictures though.) (And its on zlib.)
Single-stranded? Wouldn’t that be RNA?
Nope. RNA is chemically different: different sugar in the backbone, and there are wayyyy more than 4 RNA bases (like 12 iirc)
Nice. I learned something new today 🙂
Not sure where I picked up my belief that RNA was just one side of DNA.
It is how it’s generally taught in schools, which is unfortunate.
Yes, some viruses are single strand RNA (+ssRNA or -ssRNA) the textbook Microbiology: with Diseases by Taxonomy by Robert W Bauman is a good reference with a section for both. (Does have sqeemish pictures though.) (And its on zlib.)