Imagine being that rich and spending the limited time you have on Earth actively trying to make more money. It’s absolutely mental illness!

  • OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I put on a bit of weight a few years back and got up to 99kg. I joked with my partner that if I ate 1kg of cheese, I’d be 1% cheese.

    So like, I’m not saying it’s right, but I understand where they’re coming from with the “more, more, more” mentality.

  • Fleur_@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Well generally excess weight is bad and excess money is good

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      It’s more like narcissism, psychopathy, etc. The constant need to be better than others and worshipped for it.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If we see a street lady collecting a hundred cats to horde, we call her crazy.

      When we see someone hording so much wealth that they could never reasonably ever spend all that money in a lifetime … we put them on the cover of a magazine.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        spend all that money in a lifetime

        In thousands of lifetimes. 1,000,000 per year is a stupid amount of money to live on. If you “only” spent $1,000,000 a year you could live on 250billion for 250,000 years. That isn’t including any interest accrued.

        People constantly underestimate how large a billion actually is.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    As long as we keep treating wealth like a scoreboard, this will continue. If we collectively demonized people with unreasonable wealth, ostracized them from society, and stopped glorifying it and treating them like celebrities because of it, we might be in a better spot.

    • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Probably not. Since the point of money is to be able to buy more and better things, there will always be a desire to have more money, even if nobody else cares how much you have.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There’s no real difference between $213 billion and $270 billion when it comes to buying power. Both are effectively unlimited. Both could buy small countries if they wanted to. But there sure is a difference when it comes to ego, because when we talk about it, we’re always treating it like a great thing to be the richest person in the world, instead of sociopathy.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    tfw you realize it’s not about the money, it’s about the power the money affords you, the ability to destroy entire democracies

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But it doesn’t work like that. Wealth is a status symbol, and status symbols are comparative. Millionaires compare themselves to slightly richer millionaires, and billionaires to slightly richer billionaires. Everyone else is irrelevant to them.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    at that point it’s not really about the money

    everyone needs a purpose. if you take away that purpose, people will start deteriorating.

    “journey not the destination”. once you’ve reached something like $50M any more money doesn’t make any real difference in your daily life.

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      A lot of these guys in the comments lack basic economic understanding. People also make these comments while ignoring other investments these so-called “demons” make. The truth is there is no government in a capitalist society without the efforts of private bourgeois. We should instead advocate for higher taxes rather than whatever impractical and sensationalist solutions we may think of.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I have a lot of entrepreneur and VC friends. One of them always says that it isn’t about the money. He says “Some people have fun playing video games, board games or Dungeons and Dragons. This is my Dungeons and Dragons”.

    He says it a lot so shout out to whomever can guess who he is. Hint; he’s Austin based.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    1, yes you are correct

    2, you are wrong, because it isn’t about “I have 270 billion dollars “. It is closer to look at all the toys I have

    … sure I put up satellites, but can we put astronauts to the ISS? Cool now can we get to the moon? Mars? … etc

    • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because one of the few things he actually understands is he is not immortal, so he’s trying to make a legacy. Hence, literally offering his sperm to anyone who wants it, and not caring about anything other than making sure his name is at the top of everything he is even mildly interested in.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Having a net worth of 270 billion dollars is not synonymous with ‘having 270 billion dollars’

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      While that is true, at the moment in time they are worth that much, they easily have access to that same amount more or less simply by having better lending rates(after accounting shenanigans are all worked out)than any average person will ever have.

      In comparison, our mortgages/loans are the equivalent of using paydayloan rates

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    If you’re a billionaire intent on becoming even wealthier, that usually implies that you really enjoy being a successful businessman. I don’t see why business success for its own sake would be inherently less satisfying than other sorts of accomplishment.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You don’t achieve that level of wealth ethically or without exploitation, no matter how much business you’re doing