Imagine being that rich and spending the limited time you have on Earth actively trying to make more money. It’s absolutely mental illness!

  • Fleur_@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    Well generally excess weight is bad and excess money is good

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If we see a street lady collecting a hundred cats to horde, we call her crazy.

      When we see someone hording so much wealth that they could never reasonably ever spend all that money in a lifetime … we put them on the cover of a magazine.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        spend all that money in a lifetime

        In thousands of lifetimes. 1,000,000 per year is a stupid amount of money to live on. If you “only” spent $1,000,000 a year you could live on 250billion for 250,000 years. That isn’t including any interest accrued.

        People constantly underestimate how large a billion actually is.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    As long as we keep treating wealth like a scoreboard, this will continue. If we collectively demonized people with unreasonable wealth, ostracized them from society, and stopped glorifying it and treating them like celebrities because of it, we might be in a better spot.

    • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Probably not. Since the point of money is to be able to buy more and better things, there will always be a desire to have more money, even if nobody else cares how much you have.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There’s no real difference between $213 billion and $270 billion when it comes to buying power. Both are effectively unlimited. Both could buy small countries if they wanted to. But there sure is a difference when it comes to ego, because when we talk about it, we’re always treating it like a great thing to be the richest person in the world, instead of sociopathy.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    tfw you realize it’s not about the money, it’s about the power the money affords you, the ability to destroy entire democracies

  • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    But it doesn’t work like that. Wealth is a status symbol, and status symbols are comparative. Millionaires compare themselves to slightly richer millionaires, and billionaires to slightly richer billionaires. Everyone else is irrelevant to them.

  • kava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    at that point it’s not really about the money

    everyone needs a purpose. if you take away that purpose, people will start deteriorating.

    “journey not the destination”. once you’ve reached something like $50M any more money doesn’t make any real difference in your daily life.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I have a lot of entrepreneur and VC friends. One of them always says that it isn’t about the money. He says “Some people have fun playing video games, board games or Dungeons and Dragons. This is my Dungeons and Dragons”.

    He says it a lot so shout out to whomever can guess who he is. Hint; he’s Austin based.

    • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A lot of these guys in the comments lack basic economic understanding. People also make these comments while ignoring other investments these so-called “demons” make. The truth is there is no government in a capitalist society without the efforts of private bourgeois. We should instead advocate for higher taxes rather than whatever impractical and sensationalist solutions we may think of.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    1, yes you are correct

    2, you are wrong, because it isn’t about “I have 270 billion dollars “. It is closer to look at all the toys I have

    … sure I put up satellites, but can we put astronauts to the ISS? Cool now can we get to the moon? Mars? … etc

    • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because one of the few things he actually understands is he is not immortal, so he’s trying to make a legacy. Hence, literally offering his sperm to anyone who wants it, and not caring about anything other than making sure his name is at the top of everything he is even mildly interested in.

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Having a net worth of 270 billion dollars is not synonymous with ‘having 270 billion dollars’

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      While that is true, at the moment in time they are worth that much, they easily have access to that same amount more or less simply by having better lending rates(after accounting shenanigans are all worked out)than any average person will ever have.

      In comparison, our mortgages/loans are the equivalent of using paydayloan rates

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    If you’re a billionaire intent on becoming even wealthier, that usually implies that you really enjoy being a successful businessman. I don’t see why business success for its own sake would be inherently less satisfying than other sorts of accomplishment.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You don’t achieve that level of wealth ethically or without exploitation, no matter how much business you’re doing

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Reddit shower thoughts: if you’re in a bathtub with s toaster, you’re in a toaster^2

    Lemmy shower thoughts:

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Lemmy likes the anti work circle jerk

      I hate to break it to you but hating billionaires will not make you rich.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Fuck being rich. I’m trying to be happy and beneficial to the world around me. Money fucking sucks.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It sure as hell doesnt hurt those goals. I dont hate them because they have money. I hate them because they destabilize communities the world over to make evermore.

            • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Well that’s a more specific sentiment than the one that was expressed by OP. If you take issue with the actions that they indulge in to accrue their wealth, then I’d be right there standing beside you. OP seemed to only criticise the wealth which is a neotenous view on the topic.

              • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 hours ago

                No, they’re on point. Its deranged and signs of a mental problem collecting that much wealth. Concentrating wealth to the degree of billionaires actively harms the rest of the economy, and the world. They have so much of our single pie of resources that it is damaging to us.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So I guess showerthoughts is going to be the new platform .ml users will use to complain about capitalism? OP is a brand new account and this was their first and only post.

    Yes, I will keep calling this out.

      • simple@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        When sockpuppet accounts are posting to unrelated communities, no shit I’ll complain. “Rich people are bad” is not a showerthought and you know it, but I guess let’s just spam the platform with this nonsense and keep making new accounts to boost these posts. What’s wrong with that?

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes, I will keep calling this out.

      Thank you. Really. I start losing my faith when enough times passes since I last time saw someone event attempt to make sense on Lemmy.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Billionares are the Lemmy circle jerk. I’m tired of the antiwork Lemmy mentality. We have people here who want to make big bucks doing nothing.

      • ivn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It feels like you are missing the point on purpose. I don’t know why, this feels like laziness.

        Criticizing the existence of billionaires and being antiwork are two different things. And being antiwork is different than wanting to do nothing. No one wants to do nothing, except in cases of major depressions.

        A lot of antiwork post can lack depth but there are really interesting criticism to be made about work as it’s organized these days. I suggest you dig the subject.

      • simple@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        It will stay an echo chamber until mods step up and start removing low-effort posts. Also, people are downvoting me in favor of a fake account with one post lmao. That’s how bad it is.

        • GrammarPolice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Only if the mods didn’t share the same sentiments. Low-effort political posts in non-political communities have been and always will be a staple in lemmy. You have to understand that it is the same people who left Reddit with these sentiments and similar behaviour that are now here doing the same. Quite an unfortunate reality really

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Honestly I shouldn’t be surprised as Lemmy isn’t exactly mainstream media. If you are on Odysee you see people saying how the holocaust was a hoax and that Jews are evil. Here is isn’t quite as bad but you still see the extreme minority.