• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I object to having Nottingham in my group those guys would be more of a hindrance than anything else.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That was largely done with good old bribing people to be on your side, its also how we got the British empire as it basically started with paying various groups in India to fight eachother which is what allowed the British to conquer a nation that was far wealthier and more powerful at the time.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A united England could only take a divided Scotland by marrying into it.

    The outcome is clear, Scotland sweeps then starts fighting itself.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    10 has Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds. I reckon the only real challenge would be 13 but combining forces they could take Glasgow and then pick of any lone Highland madman.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      If the women from 13 get involved, 13.

      They will be using readily available objects as weapons however.

        • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah yes, following the rules in a fight… famously well-behaved Scots women.

          As Mad Jock MacAdder once described the old highland way of women fighting: “bare breasted and each carrying an eight pound baby!”

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sorry to break to you all, but it already happened. That’s why No. 1 is in charge.