• tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Oh wow that was a deep rabbit hole. So if I’ve understood correctly, by super determinism, the outcome of the big bang has more influence on the measurement of particles than particles have locally with one another.

        If two particles are entangled, “independent” measurements to verify this are contaminated by their causal connection to the big bang, which will still give readings that the particles are entangled.

        Or, if I have a bag with an orange and an apple, I throw one at random to Alice and one at random Bob, Alice catching an orange has nothing to do with Bob catching apple, but more to do with the which side of the bag the apple was leaning on in the bag initially?

        Is that right?

      • glitchdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t know if I didn’t understand that because I’m too drunk, or because I’m too stupid. It’s probably both but I really want to come back to this sober so I can try again.

    • sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Another person mentions Gerry Anderson-related topic

      Slowly begins raising the cymbals