Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 month agoSuper hero movies should have more scenes of them accidentally maiming people just because of the sheer amount of power they weild.message-squaremessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1199arrow-down116
arrow-up1183arrow-down1message-squareSuper hero movies should have more scenes of them accidentally maiming people just because of the sheer amount of power they weild.Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squareSatyrSack@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·1 month agoI think Hancock had a few instances of that
minus-squareLauchs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoNever got around to that one, worth it?
minus-squareicerunner_origin@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoCritically panned, across the board, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. It could have done with another couple of rounds of script polishing.
minus-squareKyrgizion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·1 month agoIt was two movies Frankensteined into one. The first half is awesome. The second, not so much.
minus-squareZahille7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoThere’s a deleted scene where Hancock meets a woman at a bar and takes her home. It’s kinda weirdly emotional and totally should’ve been left in the movie imo. Here’s the scene.
minus-squarekingthrillgore@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoIt was a script undirected for 12 years
minus-squareFosheze@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 month agoIt’s not a good movie but it’s a fun watch if you’re not expecting much.
minus-squareCosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoHave it on in the background. I never fully understood Katherine Heigl’s character and her point in the plot. It’s decent. Not great.
minus-squarekamenLady.@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoI wanted to like the movie, but drunk will smith just didn’t do it at all for me.
minus-squareAwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThe first 2/3rds of the movie is really good. The last part is pretty bad. Overall I enjoyed it.
I think Hancock had a few instances of that
Never got around to that one, worth it?
Critically panned, across the board, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. It could have done with another couple of rounds of script polishing.
It was two movies Frankensteined into one. The first half is awesome. The second, not so much.
There’s a deleted scene where Hancock meets a woman at a bar and takes her home. It’s kinda weirdly emotional and totally should’ve been left in the movie imo. Here’s the scene.
It was a script undirected for 12 years
It’s not a good movie but it’s a fun watch if you’re not expecting much.
Have it on in the background.
I never fully understood Katherine Heigl’s character and her point in the plot.
It’s decent. Not great.
Fair enough!
I wanted to like the movie, but drunk will smith just didn’t do it at all for me.
The first 2/3rds of the movie is really good. The last part is pretty bad. Overall I enjoyed it.