• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think this is pretty blatant. Sadly, I don’t think there is anything we’ll be able to do about this. The onus is on you and the prosecution to prove that they did.

    I thought the fallout from that would lead to companies being careful about the AI voices they use for things like product demos and tutorials…

    Oh, honey…

  • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Oh so I guess piracy is fine if it’s citizens getting robbed huh? Funny how that works.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sadly, it was Grace Hopper who said “It’s easier to ask forgiveness than it is to get permission.”

      Rear Admiral Grace Murray Hopper (9 December 1906 – 1 January 1992) was a U.S. Naval officer, and an early computer programmer. She was the developer of the first compiler for a computer programming language; at the end of her service she was the oldest serving officer in the United States Navy.

      That brings me to the most important piece of advice that I can give to all of you: if you’ve got a good idea, and it’s a contribution, I want you to go ahead and DO IT. It is much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.

      • The future: Hardware, Software, and People in Carver, 1983
      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Except she probably wasn’t referring to identity theft; just how to handle dumb shits in management.

  • thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We are going to need much stronger image rights for individuals in the AI age.

    There’s no way to stop the technology itself (although current development may plateau at some point), so there must be strong legal restrictions on abusing it.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Do you want the rich to be richer? Because that’s how you make the rich richer. People like Scarlett Johanson will be able to license their likeness for millions or billions. Of course, we would have the same rights; the same rights to own a mansion and a yacht. Feeling lucky?

      That’s the kind of capitalism that Marx rages against: Laws that let people demand money without contributing labor.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There’s no future where this affects me in the slightest. Okay, so jeff Goldblum can get a few more shekels for renting his voice. This doesn’t affect me: that’s his JOB, whether they stole his likeness and paid him, paid him and cloned his voice, or paid him to do the speaking. It’s the same thing, imho.

        Talk to me when people who don’t have their voice recorded get an unfair leg-up for selling it. I’ll be okay with it then, too, but let me know.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The real risk is the voice being sold to Disney or Sony Music, and then youtube videos are getting removed because of similarities.

          Voice tones aren’t all that unique in most cases and there’s too much room for abuse imo. The Scarjo and open ai scandal is a good example of this. The voices weren’t that similar and I’m just not interested in having celebrities own whole spectrums like that.

        • General_Effort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          And it’s a landlord’s job to collect rent. It’s Elon Musk’s job to maximize shareholder value.

          It’s ok if you watch out for numero uno. I’m not expecting more. But you are wrong to think that this doesn’t affect you. You can’t opt out of society. You won’t be able to avoid products with licensed voices. Your taxes will be paying for enforcement against “pirates”. And most importantly, every new privilege for the rich and famous changes society. With every step, the elite becomes more entrenched and the bottom more hopeless. It’s a matter of enlightened self-interest. If we only reject what directly hurts us individually, then the elites will simply build themselves a new feudalism.

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, the genie is out of the bottle on this one. I can do voice cloning with consumer hardware and available models. That can’t be undone, but good legal protections would be nice.

      That said, the Johanson case is a bad example because it really didn’t sound much like her at all. It was a chipper yound white lady sound, but to my ear sounded nothing like Johanson. It did sound kinda like a character she voiced, but I would not gave confused the two. They cloned the voice of someone they paid to give a similar inflection as the voice from Her. That’s far removed from cloning Johanson herself. It is closer to people making music “in the style of”.