• njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, the article, or I should I say ads with writing in between, says"potentially non-toxic". Which I find to be a highly troublesome qualifier.

      • bdot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        perhaps it’s worded that way for legal reasons? maybe if they flat out said it was non-toxic, and then it turned out that they were wrong, someone could sue them.

        i am sure it’s the same sort of idea behind posting a video of someone committing a crime on camera, they use the word “allegedly”

        dunno; not a lawyer