• paf0@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s the headline from the article and I’m not allowed to change it. I ended up having to copy paste it as the automatic import did not work, so I suppose the title tag could be different. I can’t quite tell on my phone.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah. I meant it’s not your fault it’s a dumb headline, it’s the journalist/editor who picked it.

      I should have explicitly said that to be clear tho considering how much hassle you’ve went thru to get a post in

        • paf0@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          My preconceived notion is that people should fight for the things they believe in and not just shift their beliefs because the money said so. Strange, I know.

          • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            My preconceived notion is that people shouldn’t amplify misleading headlines. That goes doubly for people who criticize misleading headlines when the shoe is on the other foot.

            • paf0@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s not misleading if I provide a date in the body, one is provided in the article/blog and the candidate totally said all of that. I’m not allowed to change the title, so how am I otherwise supposed to compensate for a lack of reading comprehension?