• curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The book burning was not malicious. It was a test to see if the other party is malicious.

      • curiousaur@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easy to see through? What are you talking about?

        It’s not aggressive.

        It’s only desecration if you believe Islamic law.

          • curiousaur@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not even close to malicious as it gets. That brain dead take is the point of burning it.

            If you think burning paper is as malicious as it gets, where do you place mass killings and terrorism on your maliciousness scale?

                  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You keep using the word malicious, so in order to move forward, I feel we need to get a sense of your maliciousness scale.

                    So, punching someone in the face, more or less malicious then burning some paper?