jeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 9 个月前The food delivery bubble is bursting — and maybe that's not a bad thingwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square98linkfedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down13
arrow-up1377arrow-down1external-linkThe food delivery bubble is bursting — and maybe that's not a bad thingwww.salon.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 9 个月前message-square98linkfedilink
minus-squaremorrowind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 个月前What happens when the restaurants aren’t satisfied with the government service and decide to go with some third party? Or run their own, as many still do?
minus-squareMataVatnik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·9 个月前I don’t see the issue with a private/public option
minus-squaremorrowind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 个月前OP wants it made public to go prevent abuse. If you have both we’re back to square one
minus-squareMataVatnik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 个月前If the public provides a good service and price then the private will have to be at least equally affordable and and good service in order to compete
minus-squaremorrowind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·9 个月前Unless it’s subsidized, it’s very unlikely it will be able to compete on price
minus-squareChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 个月前Same as what happens when people use FedEx instead of the post office. They pay more for premium service.
What happens when the restaurants aren’t satisfied with the government service and decide to go with some third party? Or run their own, as many still do?
I don’t see the issue with a private/public option
OP wants it made public to go prevent abuse. If you have both we’re back to square one
If the public provides a good service and price then the private will have to be at least equally affordable and and good service in order to compete
Unless it’s subsidized, it’s very unlikely it will be able to compete on price
Same as what happens when people use FedEx instead of the post office. They pay more for premium service.