• Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    So we’re starting to look at aluminum debris in the upper atmosphere, when are we going to look at carbon fibre debris? Or rocket fuel in the upper atmosphere? We dont know what any of that shit does. Im going to hazard a guess that it does nothing good.

    If you were to light ten thousand Starlink satellites on fire in a bonfire on the ground people would put you in jail. When it happens in the upper atmosphere its called progress.

    • ekZepp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Completely stopping the launch of new satellites will simply not happen. The only realistic response is to face the problem and improve the technology.

      • Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s the problem with capitalism. They won’t improve the technology until we force them

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Just like they’re doing with the climate catastrophe.

        Reasoned, sensible change, carried out quickly and paid for by the companies responsible.

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Well, it did work for the ozone hole.

          It should work for the current climate catastrophe and the aluminium thing too, if about 50% of the electorate, 90% of its representatives, and 99% of the people in charge of big companies weren’t mentally handicapped imbeciles, too (if we count being a psychopath as a mental handicap).