• tenextrathrills@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Good, I’d rather not have you in my bar if your behavior is such that you’re worried about not being able to get in my bar.

    • Bruhh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Except now the bars can easily sell my data to corps without my goddamn permission. It isn’t about having things to hide. It’s about resonable privacy. According to the article, the company can track VIPs and “big spenders” and treat them differently. They can also deny you entry on “potential” risks. I wonder what systems they use to determine a denial of entry.

      • 200ok@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s all self-reported. For example, if they don’t like how much you tipped, they can flag you. It’s all subjective.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Can’t wait to get banned from the queer bar in my neighborhood after the bartender I buy whiskey from on my business trip to Kentucky flags my faggot ass as a major disruption because they think I’m a child-grooming Satanist.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You may not have read that right. I don’t think they are saying that it’s their behavior that is the reason that they won’t enter, it’s the fact that you are using a partner that makes digital copies and photographs patrons. It’s a huge invasion of privacy. It’s one thing for security cameras, it’s a whole different level to also be copying ID’s AND then also sharing that information to parties outside the establishment.