The sorry state of streaming residuals shows why SAG and the WGA are striking.

  • lemmyman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think I’m ignorant of the gig-work nature of these things - I am, by choice, a contractor, but in a different field (engineering services). But my contracts specify that the deliverables are “works for hire” and that the client owns all IP, and I am not entitled to residuals or royalties or any other income from the work I’ve done under such contracts.

    I just genuinely don’t know if writers thought that they should be getting more. And if so, why?Because there are plenty of analogous (i.e. IP-generating) jobs that don’t have such arrangements.

    • QHC@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just genuinely don’t know if writers thought that they should be getting more. And if so, why?

      What do you mean by “more”, and relative to what? The main complaint from writers are that in recent years the trend has been them all getting paid significantly less. Not just a few percentage points, more like 1-10% of what they used to get.

      So, they want to get paid the same as they used to, which is more than currently but not “more” when looked at from a longer time frame.

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s different with writers, because if their contracts worked like ours did they would have no hope of retiring. So when a fat fish like Suits comes along everyone who has a hand in making it is hoping to swing that either into money or more lucrative work.

      That’s the way I’ve come to see it. Actual writers may disagree