• Aa!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    The point isn’t the “excuse”, it’s the criticism over him not having full power behind his voice during the debate being irrelevant.

    Which is incidentally the only real criticism I could see this morning, beyond people falsely claiming he was incoherent. Which he absolutely was not.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Oh right, his just going mid-sentence from abortion to illegal immigration is textbook coherency, amirite?

      Like PSA said, “new strategy to pivot from your strongest to your weakest issue!”

      Tell me you didn’t watch the debate without telling me.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The new pro-Biden platform is that it was all about a cold making his voice soft. Of course they are going to ignore the actual issues. A real primary would have made things much more obvious, when you had him on stage with some 40 and 50 year old folks.