• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    While it’s not damaged and will just wash off in the rain, they shouldn’t be doing this to irrelevant monuments. It’s getting nobody on your side.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Stonehenge is a monument built thousands of years ago, way before humans started mass polluting the Earth, how is it relevant to climate change?

        • illi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh, I completely misunderstood your comment. Thought you were saying Stonehenge is irrelevant just in general which would be crazy to me

        • kbal@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s relevant to climate change in that it was recently used by Just Stop Oil activists to draw attention to their cause. I guess one could also say that the sudden violent transformation of ancient stones that have stood largely unchanged for thousands of years is symbolically appropriate.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        A monument built thousands and thousands of years ago has no correlation to current day pollution/climate change. I think you missed the context. They should be targeting polluters or protectors of polluters, not an innocent heritage site.