• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    OK then, so this is incredibly far from being near any real world application

    I’d disagree with that, but we certainly need more info.

    There are places on Earth where 300wh would be plenty and very far away from traditional power grids. Think like remote sensing weather stations or data collection stations. So a small solar panel could power these during the day and these supercapacitors would replace a wearable battery currently in use today.

    We’d need more information how these perform under various temperature and moisture conditions.

    • Grippler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      A cubic meter is just a whole lot of volume for incredibly little power. A regular 80Ah car battery has almost 4 times the power capapcity as a cubic meter of this.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        Power density doesn’t always matter. There are applications where space is abundant, but regular maintenance is prohibitively expensive.

        In my quick example of a remote monitoring station, it may cost $10,000+ to send a helicopter out to change the 12v car battery when it dies from exposure to extreme temperatures in 5 years or less. If something like this supercapacitor can last 20+ years without every be visited, it would be more cost effective.

      • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You wouldn’t build a foundation with lithium batteries though. This is additional power from something that would take up this space anyway