I very rarely downvote people but @RobotToaster you are just posting the most gutterish drivel. We get you don’t like Labour but if you insist on posting here please try to elevate the quality of your sources and commentary. 57p for the graphic sounds like the sort of bargain we need after 14 years of corrupt Tory contracts.
Thank you for the feedback.
I figured it’s better to know the reason than not.
So he paid, 57p rather than paying his mates tens or hundreds of thousands for it. This is a good step in the right direction.
Imagine being annoying they didn’t waste money.
People would soon complain if they’d used a poncey design studio and coughed up half a million.
Even if they’d found the correct middle-ground - paying, say, £10k for a design studio to make something that’s new but not over-priced - people would still find some way to complain.
I don’t see anything correct in spending £20k of their election budget on a logo. No one likes new logos and everyone thinks they’re not worth the money. Well thank goodness this one is!
Exactly. No matter what they spent on the logo, someone would be unhappy about it.
I don’t see it. And who gives a shit what the logo is? Is this all journalism has to offer?Bacon sandwich-gate tier piss taking…
