• Alto@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Stares at most PDX games having increasing player counts

    How much of this is the lack of people wanting to play strategy games vs the lack of good strategy games

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 months ago

      exactly what i was going to ask. Uh, when was the last good strategy game? Looking at my steam library…

      I have 2000+ hours in factory games, Factorio, Satisfactory, Dyson Sphere… not really strategy but those are solid thought based games released <10 years ago

      Then… Age of Empires 4? Civ 6? Both pale in comparison to their predecessors. Cities Skylines 1… but then there’s the whole thing about 2. Star Trek Infinite was a flop and from what I read was just a horrible bland game. Serious, what has come out by big studios in the last 5 years in terms of strategy? I see more flashy graphics than strategy in these recent games.

      • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Victoria 3 is the only one I can think of, but the reception is lack luster. Maybe I’ll pick it up I’m 5 DLCs

        • Taiatari@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I really like Victoria 3, it has its issues but I don’t mind them that much. I find much of the criticism is from ppl. who played Victoria 2.

          In terms of other new games there is humankind which is similar to the Civ series. It has some great new concepts but some weirdness that I for unknown reasons can’t move past.

        • Iceblade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah I quite enjoy vicky 3, my main issue with it is that there always seem every play through seems to have a bug pop up and break the immersion

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Exactly! I absolutely love EU4 and am excited about the likely next installment. Unfortunately, I’m less excited about their other recent launches, because the depth of strategy just isn’t quite there.

      But then I look around and can’t really find a comparable game. There’s Total War, but y strategy there is pretty weak and more about battlefield tactics than actual grand strategy. Civ exists, but it’s in a pretty different category (and not really my thing; I do like Civ IV though). I own a lot of strategy games, but most are kind of shallow. I love complex games with a lot of moving parts, which yields a lot of variation game to game, and that just isn’t all that common outside of PDX games.

      • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I cant get past eu4 mid game. I get early wins, can’t keep up in much, get swarmed by 30k artillery groups and 100+ fleets.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          For armies:

          1. Fill combat width, esp the front line, and ideally the back line (back line is essential in end game)
          2. Keep up on tech, including your mercs - need to rehire every few decades
          3. Choose good battles - terrain matters (e.g. don’t attack into the mountains), stack size matters; retreat if you’re caught in a bad battle
          4. Get some buffs - morale is most important early game, discipline and combat ability starts to matter more by mid game; you should focus on one or two areas to specialize (so idea groups and policies should synergize with national ideas)
          5. Have good leaders - should have high army tradition, so your leaders should all be 2-3 star generals

          Usually by mid game, I’m steamrolling everyone and am the biggest great power, even if I started small. Consider watching some streamers/YouTubers, many do a good job explaining things as they go.

          For navies:

          1. Watch battles and retreat if you start seeing red on your side - naval battles have a domino effect, so if you’re seeing more red on their side, consider continuing, you might capture more than you lose
          2. Morale is the most important factor here - if you’re outnumbered, check individual ships and leave the low morale and damaged ships in port
          3. If you’re filling combat width, the easy strategy is to get a bunch of heavies - don’t worry about the inland sea malace (heavies are fine in inland sea, galleys suck in deep water), if you can out-gun them, you’ll probably win
          4. Pick your naval doctrine carefully - if you get galley combat ability, consider going all galleys and go over force limit as needed - it’s cheaper to be over force limit with galleys than at force limit with heavies
          5. Naval leaders don’t matter all that much, they can break a tie, but that’s about it; individual ship morale is king in navies
          6. It takes a long time for AI to repair boats, so popping in and out of port can be a great way to whittle down their navy and eventually win - make sure to retreat as needed to not lose boats
          7. If you have naval dominance, destroy their navy entirely (occupy provinces with their boats, engage, repeat until it’s dead)
          8. Don’t fight with light ships, they’re a liability (see 2, they get morale hammered); transport ships are really hardy, so use them as a bullet sponge if you need to fill combat width

          Enemy fleet size doesn’t matter at all. You can defeat 100+ ship fleets if you can beat the ships that engage (like 20-30), you just need to get it to start to domino. So commit to either galleys (with galley combat naval doctrine) or heavies, and if you start to lose, retreat, repair, and reengage.

          By the mid game, it’s easy to absolutely dominate if you play the early game well. Your goal in the early game is to build a power base, which means:

          • expand your borders a bit by taking good land - centers of trade, defendable mountain passes, etc
          • reduce autonomy
          • get good synergies in your idea groups
          • border the countries you want to engage in the middle game
          • build the right buildings

          So by mid game, you should be a regional, if not global, power, and your time will be spent gobbling up land and converting wrong religion land. I usually stop playing about 1650-1700 because I’ve usually already accomplished my goals. Late game, the game should be pretty easy, except the 2-3 big powers you’ve neglected all game.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yeah, pick a big nation, ally another big nation, and only fight battles you know you can win. If you and your ally are big enough, you shouldn’t get attacked.

              It’s a complex game, so consider lowering the difficulty if you’re having trouble as a big nation.