• IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    You pass legislation to make the company unprofitable by making it fulfill it’s obligation to invest in infrastructure to the point where the funds run for the hills.

    • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      so the shareholders pull their funds, the water companies struggle and the taxpayer has to step in to bail them out.

        • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          yes that would be awesome, but the problem is that “make it publicly owned” means “buy out their shares” which is giving them a bailout, plus “service all the debt the company is in” which is another bailout, before you’ve even got started with fixing the horrible lack of investment over many years

          • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            but the problem is that “make it publicly owned” means “buy out their shares” which is giving them a bailout

            The shares would be almost worthless.

            plus “service all the debt the company is in” which is another bailout

            Nope, the company would be wound up.

          • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Buying the shares is cheap if the company is worth nothing /goes bankrupt from fines for their environmental breaches